ADL controls Covid information on social media: Gil-Delgado Fernandez
Do vaccine mandates or censoring questions about leaky, full-length spike protein jabs advance the organization’s mission? (Updated 2/25/22)
Monserrat Gil-Delgado Fernández writes in Noticiero Universal (translated by Karen Smith; emphasis in original):
Currently, ADL [the Jewish Anti-Defamation League] is the one that controls the publications on YouTube, Twitter and Facebook, always vigilant in its task of filtering messages that do not comply with official doctrines.
[In] 2019, current executive director of the League [Jonathan Greenblatt], who was Obama's special adviser, made a statement in which he clearly warned YouTube to change the platform's policies and remove comments and videos that contradict or contribute to established historical dogmas. stimulating hatred or any content that might be considered offensive.
Facebook is also under ADL surveillance, especially after the platform was threatened with a widespread boycott if it did not control revisionist rhetoric because, according to ADL censors, questioning the Holocaust is an intolerable incitement to hatred.
But today, and for more than a year, the most persecuted channels are those that provide alternative information about the pandemic.
All those who do not agree with the official version, or dare to question the goodness of the genetic treatment they want to inoculate the world population, or in short, contradict the WHO covid dogmas, are mercilessly removed from the platform.
The control strategy of the media and social networks regarding the treatment of data about the disease called Covid 19 was established at Event 201, in October 2019, when the pandemic was simulated, which, curiously, was reproduced as was conceived.
And this gag was scrupulously transferred to social networks. We now know who is behind the worldwide Ministry of Truth.
Those who decide on truth and falsehood are the same ones who want to persuade themselves to inoculate themselves with experimental genetic material. Eventually everything stays in the house and all roads lead to Rome.
If this information is true, one might ask:
How is it in ADL’s interest to censor journalists like Alex Berenson or physicians and scientists like Peter McCullough, who raise concerns and ask questions about Covid testing, lockdowns, and vaccine design and policy?
What does opposing vaccine passports and mandates, or questioning universal jabs with leaky spike protein vaccines having no long-term safety studies, have to do with ADL’s mission of advancing [redacted] interests?