“People in charge of the military want to harm their soldiers” with jab mandates: Nass
“Perhaps they've been given orders to weaken our defenses,” says physician (Updated 9/5/22)
Video: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/chd-friday-roundtable
In a September 2022 Children’s Health Defense roundtable, Dr. Meryl Nass describes the indefensible mandating of Covid vaccines for all US military personnel without any long-term safety studies and despite FDA approval of the latest Pfizer and Moderna mRNA boosters this week being based only on one reported study of antibody levels in eight mice and with no human testing.
At 25:20, Toby Rogers PhD also discusses this issue.
Video: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/chd-friday-roundtable
Meryl Nass MD (at 27:20):
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and the rest are well aware of what's going on.
They're facing all these lawsuits by soldiers regarding the vaccines.
And I think they are perfectly willing to sacrifice readiness and sacrifice a lot of soldiers.
Perhaps they've been given their orders, and the goal is, in fact, to weaken our defenses.
Maybe it's felt the US military would be defending the American people against some outside threat, and we don't want them to be able to do so.
There's another issue [for] the military specifically: it's illegal for them to get an EUA vaccine without informed consent.
Now, it's sort of illegal for everybody.
But there's a second law only for the military: the President needs to make a declaration saying soldiers don't need informed consent in order to get an unlicensed vaccine.
A slip opinion by Dawn Johnsen at the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel said this in black and white for the military last year.
So the military, more than any other entity, more than health care institutions, by pushing this on their soldiers, know they are skating on thin ice because the law is against them.
And they're doing it anyway. So I suggest there's a big reason for this.
We don't know what the reason is, but there is a reason they — people in charge of the military — want to harm their soldiers.
Another issue is whether now, at military bases, suddenly bottles of [Pfizer’s US licensed mRNA vaccine] Comirnaty have started showing up.
Bottles of supposedly licensed vaccine, which have not appeared anywhere else in the United States, have appeared on maybe a couple of dozen military bases.
And this may not even be licensed Comirnaty. It may be unlicensed Comirnaty from Europe, where the Comirnaty label is used for unlicensed vaccines in Europe.
But in the United States, that label is only for licensed vaccines.
And so the military may be, in fact, committing a fraud on its own soldiers to try to pretend that it has a licensed product.
So you've sort of opened a can of worms about the military issues, but I think we should take them very seriously.
I think we have been remiss to not study these vials more carefully and figure out whether a major fraud case can be brought against the Department of Defense.
I served on active duty for almost 35 years, retired in 2008. I cannot imagine what is going on inside the services today. It's little wonder the services are almost unable to recruit sufficient numbers to fill their ranks.
That said, given the way the military services are employed, I doubt seriously whether we ever will need robust military formations in combat to fight any enemy. Nearly all military operations are carried out without the need for large numbers of ground troops. We either send drones or special operations personnel. So, it's fair to conclude that maintaining a large military establishment is more of a deterrent than a real threat to potential enemies. It's numbers that matter more than combat readiness. Pity those who now are serving; they, like the rest of us "useless eaters," serve a very limited purpose in the big scheme of things.
I have some simple questions. Has the Russian military all gotten the m-RNA jab? Has the Chinese PRC Army all gotten the m-RNA jab? And our "leaders" want our soldiers (young men) to get the M-RNA jab with the risks? Simple questions.. where are answers? I think I know. I think treason is involved. Oh - 30 yrs USAFR Flight surgeon O-6 retired here,( in a prior century.)