Berkeley Law Dean Chemerinsky hoodwinks public into thinking Covid vaccine mandates are “sensible”

Leaky spike protein vaccines raise infectious pressure and can’t produce herd immunity or end the pandemic. Mandating them is nothing but brutal tyranny. (Updated 3/8/22)

On January 13, the US Supreme Court blocked the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) rule mandating that employers with 100+ employees require COVID-19 vaccination and/or testing of employees, pending further review by the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Ten days before the decision, law professor and UC Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky wrote an op-ed for the LA Times, ”Will the Supreme Court back sensible workplace vaccine mandates?”

The title of the article presumes “sensible workplace vaccine mandates” exist and implies any court is merely acting sensibly by requiring people to be vaccinated to work, earn a living, and feed their family.

If the title’s question were asked in a court hearing or deposition, a good lawyer would object that it “lacks foundation” and “assumes facts not in evidence.”

It’s like asking, “Will the Court back hilarious homicide” or “stylish robbery”?

In fact, there’s no such thing as a “sensible” mandate for current Covid vaccines.

This is because of the vaccines’ design flaws and administration to people under the high infectious pressure of a pandemic.

Virologist Geert Vanden Bossche describes some of these problems:

James Hill, MD @jhillmd

Giving single-target spike protein vaccines in a pandemic without blocking infection or transmission: - selects for vax-resistant strains like Omicron - prevents herd immunity - suppresses innate immunity by Ab competition - raises infectious pressure

Vanden Bossche details how current single-target (spike protein-only) vaccines, which don’t substantially block infection or transmission, increase infectious pressure (circulating virus) in the population when administered during a pandemic.

And they can lead to a public health disaster though selection of vaccinal immunity-escape variants like Omicron and eventual vaccine-enhanced disease, of which antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is a type. This could potentially kill billions of vaccinated people upon infection with a future resistant variant.

Current mass vaccination can lead to mass die-off of the vaccinated by ADE: Vanden Bossche

In demanding the unvaccinated have their freedoms restricted, Chemerinsky’s article fails to mention any of the following issues with current vaccines:

1. They encode the toxic viral spike protein, known to cause blood clotting, inflammation, and other adverse effects and which appears to be a bioweapon;

2. They narrowly focus only on the spike protein antigen, allowing easy escape by the virus from vaccinal immunity;

3. They are nonsterilizing (“leaky”), meaning they limit illness — at least at first — but don’t prevent viral infection or transmission;

4. They select for more infectious, vaccinal antibody-escape viral variants, such as Delta and Omicron, particularly rapidly when mass vaccination occurs during a pandemic, i.e., under high infectious pressure.;

5. They select for variants likely evolving to become more deadly, as current vaccines are antitoxin (reducing hospitalizations and deaths) but not infection blocking;

6. According to the FDA for Pfizer’s vaccine, there is “insufficient [available data] to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy”;

7. They erode natural, innate immunity to coronaviruses, especially in young, healthy people;

8. According to the FDA, Pfizer’s vaccine “has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility”;

9. According to the FDA, for Pfizer’s vaccine, there is insufficient available data “to assess the effects … on the breastfed infant or on milk production or excretion”;

10. They fail to exclude potentially dangerous epitopes (amino acid sequence regions) in the spike protein that could provoke autoimmunity (see Vojdani and Kanduc) or antibody dependent enhancement of coronavirus infections; and

11. They lack any long-term safety and efficacy data.

Current vaccines cannot create herd immunity or end the pandemic.

Mandating them is unhelpful, foolhardy, and discriminatory.

Disclaimer: I’ve respected Professor Chemerinsky, one of the brightest American legal minds, for over two decades. I had the pleasure of taking several of his law review courses.

But on this topic, he and several other prominent lawyers like Alan Dershowitz cite false assumptions about Covid vaccines in an apparent rush to impose authoritarian policies.

Source: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-01-03/supreme-court-covid-mandates