Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity
hillmd.substack.com
Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity
(Updated 3/6/22)
3
Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity
hillmd.substack.com
Dr. Jessica Rose’s December 2021 article ”Is someone staggering the more 'toxic' Vax Lots?” makes the important point about Craig Paardekooper’s findings on toxic Covid vaccine lots (batches) that batch production dates don’t necessarily correspond to administration (injection) dates.
This is correct and must be noted.
But Dr. Rose’s article does not appear to invalidate Paardekooper’s main conclusion: vaccine lots, labeled in alphanumeric sequences, have varying toxicity.
3
Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity
hillmd.substack.com
The Vaccine Adverse Event Recording System at vaers.hhs.gov include the 'vaccination month' as a searchable parameter. By going to the "How Bad is My Batch" app (dailyexpose.uk) you can search for a batch number. Using VAERS, you can then search the batch number and see what months the vaccination was given. I assure you you will find that they are clustered in time. I have already done this for multiple batches. I would agree with Dr. Hill's assessment here; I think that good minds should continue to mine the data and we should independently corroborate the truth of Craig Paardekooper's analysis. I do think we will find that Pfizer was in fact dose testing on the US populace with an Experimental Use medicine - a clear violation of medical ethics, the Nuremberg Code of 1947, and international laws.
I thought the exact same thing. She seemed to focus on his mistake (which he has now edited out of his video) and ignore the more significant aspects of his discoveries.