James Hill MD’s Newsletter

Share this post

Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity

hillmd.substack.com

Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity

(Updated 3/6/22)

James Hill, MD
Dec 12, 2021
9
3
Share this post

Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity

hillmd.substack.com

Dr. Jessica Rose’s December 2021 article ”Is someone staggering the more 'toxic' Vax Lots?” makes the important point about Craig Paardekooper’s findings on toxic Covid vaccine lots (batches) that batch production dates don’t necessarily correspond to administration (injection) dates.

This is correct and must be noted.

But Dr. Rose’s article does not appear to invalidate Paardekooper’s main conclusion: vaccine lots, labeled in alphanumeric sequences, have varying toxicity.

3
Share this post

Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity

hillmd.substack.com
3 Comments
Mike PhD
Dec 23, 2021Liked by James Hill, MD

The Vaccine Adverse Event Recording System at vaers.hhs.gov include the 'vaccination month' as a searchable parameter. By going to the "How Bad is My Batch" app (dailyexpose.uk) you can search for a batch number. Using VAERS, you can then search the batch number and see what months the vaccination was given. I assure you you will find that they are clustered in time. I have already done this for multiple batches. I would agree with Dr. Hill's assessment here; I think that good minds should continue to mine the data and we should independently corroborate the truth of Craig Paardekooper's analysis. I do think we will find that Pfizer was in fact dose testing on the US populace with an Experimental Use medicine - a clear violation of medical ethics, the Nuremberg Code of 1947, and international laws.

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply
Stephan Blackford
Dec 25, 2021·edited Dec 25, 2021Liked by James Hill, MD

I thought the exact same thing. She seemed to focus on his mistake (which he has now edited out of his video) and ignore the more significant aspects of his discoveries.

Expand full comment
Reply
1 more comment…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 James Hill, MD
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing