The concept of "reckless experiment" appears to be the one that has the most support so far. Also, very inconsistent manufacturing processes. The intentional poisoning people so far have only made inferential arguments. i.e. the injections are dangerous therefore whomever deployed them must have been trying to genocide people. That is no…
The concept of "reckless experiment" appears to be the one that has the most support so far. Also, very inconsistent manufacturing processes. The intentional poisoning people so far have only made inferential arguments. i.e. the injections are dangerous therefore whomever deployed them must have been trying to genocide people. That is not sound logic. We need to keep digging. Now that some good guys have control of the security apparatus (they are not perfect), we could get more data as we did from the CIA yesterday.
“[T]he injections are dangerous therefore whomever deployed them must have been trying to genocide people.”
No, that is a straw man argument.
Evidence of intent is much stronger than that.
As Dr. Yeadon has mentioned, every step in the design and manufacture of Covid shots must be carefully planned. There is no aspect of following decisions that could not have been intentional and well thought out:
(a) to use lipid nanoparticles with known extensive biodistributions;
(b) to encode the full-length spike protein, known to have many adverse effects;
(c) to include undeclared DNA plasmids and the SV40 promoter in vaccine vials;
I have been consistently of the opinion that it was not the intention of these first, mass uses of mRNA “vaccines” (they’re not vaccines) to kill very large numbers of people.
I anticipated that it was mainly to entrain the notion that “When there’s a pandemic (there aren’t any pandemics) then we rapidly get new technology vaccines”.
I anticipated that we’d see much more of this technology and that ultimately it will become a routine compliance control system accompanied by the ability to reduce the population in whatever manner those in control choose.
The concept of "reckless experiment" appears to be the one that has the most support so far. Also, very inconsistent manufacturing processes. The intentional poisoning people so far have only made inferential arguments. i.e. the injections are dangerous therefore whomever deployed them must have been trying to genocide people. That is not sound logic. We need to keep digging. Now that some good guys have control of the security apparatus (they are not perfect), we could get more data as we did from the CIA yesterday.
“[T]he injections are dangerous therefore whomever deployed them must have been trying to genocide people.”
No, that is a straw man argument.
Evidence of intent is much stronger than that.
As Dr. Yeadon has mentioned, every step in the design and manufacture of Covid shots must be carefully planned. There is no aspect of following decisions that could not have been intentional and well thought out:
(a) to use lipid nanoparticles with known extensive biodistributions;
(b) to encode the full-length spike protein, known to have many adverse effects;
(c) to include undeclared DNA plasmids and the SV40 promoter in vaccine vials;
(d) to forbid serial numbers by contract on vials or cartons, in violation of at least US law. https://hillmd.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-dangerous-features
And there are many more indications of intent:
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/in-a-covid-bioweapon-operation-strange
Suspicious that there is shadowbanning within substack….
It sure is.
The question then is - how did they manage to fail so badly?
Or is there a delayed reaction? Others say these are connected to transhumanism somehow.
I have been consistently of the opinion that it was not the intention of these first, mass uses of mRNA “vaccines” (they’re not vaccines) to kill very large numbers of people.
I anticipated that it was mainly to entrain the notion that “When there’s a pandemic (there aren’t any pandemics) then we rapidly get new technology vaccines”.
I anticipated that we’d see much more of this technology and that ultimately it will become a routine compliance control system accompanied by the ability to reduce the population in whatever manner those in control choose.
I still think this.
Interesting - thanks.