110 Comments

Yup. The message for the average person- follow none.

No one is here to save you, you must save yourself. Now if that concept scares you, then you will follow anyone with the "right" presentation. So eventually you'll fall for it

If that concept invigorates you, then your inner voice is strong and you will be hard to capture.

😉

Expand full comment

🎯🎯🎯

Expand full comment

I do not think Del Bigtree should be lumped into this group. He himself is unvaxxed and all his kids are it’s not like he just suddenly joined the antivaxxers. People who got the vaccine then decided they were bad are much more suspicious to me. He has done tons of work in many states helping to keep mandates from happening. He came to Oregon to help us because he saw the same thing happening here that happened in California well before Covid crap happened. I think he is trying to speak to the people who don’t get it yet. And actually get legislation changed to benefit those of us that don’t want them for ourselves or our children. If they didn’t fight all these lawsuits where the hell would we be? Most people wouldn’t know anything about what’s going on. The lawsuits forced the pushers to admit what is actually in vaccines to the public and on record. Not counting covid

Expand full comment

Good points. Thank you, Tami.

There’s no doubt all these people all do great good in many respects.

That’s why I struggle to write articles like this. I don’t want to diminish the benefits many of these leaders have brought the public.

The article’s focus, however, is on how they steer us away from seeing who is behind a more diabolical rationale for the injections, as suggested by the evidence.

Expand full comment

Why in the hell are you calling them "leaders"? They are either "elected public SERVANTS", corporate representatives, or private ctizens, none of which are leading me anywhere, ever! Anyone whom allows others to lead them anywhere is a mush head "follower". Caviat: Anyone who shows up at my private property, or violates my soveriegn freedom of movement in an attempt to "lead" me with a tyrannical "manditory" anything, had best be wearing bullit proof head gear, because that's exactly where I will be placing the teflon coated, hollowpoint, injection, from my .44 magnum vaccinator! As my brother "Mute" once said, "Nobody is bullitproof!" Mute was a 3 tour, vietnam, S.F. vetran, whom died from agent orange exposure, and he served, believing he was doing his duty to help secure your FREEDOMS. Don't squander his efforts!

FYI, ... that is the EXACT reason the 2nd Amendment was created, and all you mush head followers better get with the program and be prepared to preserve your life, liberty, and property by using deadly force, if be needed, and remember, in order to have your "GOD GIVEN" RIGHTS, you "MUST" ENFORCE YOUR RIGHTS! It was written into the maxims of Jurisprudence for a reason. Give me liberty or give me death and live free or die! Those aren't the meek words of mush head followers!

Expand full comment

Wilber, I feel your energy! Blessings ~

Expand full comment

The mob does good to deflect from their other actions.

Expand full comment

As long as he believes the fraudulent germ theory, he is compromised and will lead people down a fatal path

He says not all jabs are bad. They are.

Vaccinations are a criminal procedure that’s been a fraud from its inception.

READ AND LEARN THE HISTORY:

https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/5-huge-historical-vaccine-frauds

Expand full comment

These folks are far from being ignorant. The pseudoscience of virology, fraud of germ theory has been presented to all these folks by many experts since 2020. Whitney Webb and a whole slew of alt folks say the no virus folks are a distraction. That’s a whole nother group of controlled op people.

Expand full comment

Correct. Del is ignorant or controlled op. And I doubt he’s ignorant.

Expand full comment

agree re DEL

Expand full comment

Yes. Did see that. Who did these tests? When? Were those tests confirmed by independent labs. Who chose the vials to test? Random? How? What is the definition of mRNA (“manufactured” RNA); being a synthetic biology suite or “soup” of: Gene Drive Organisms GDOs, Human Artificial Chromosomes HACs, and existing patent rights over the engineered/manufactured “products” (i.e. “us”).

GDOs

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/gene-drive-organisms

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/black-box-biotechnology

HACs

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166075/

Grimes B.R., Monaco Z.L. Artificial and engineered chromosomes:developments and prospects for gene therapy. Chromosoma. 2005;4:230–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Lino C.A., Harper J.C., Carney J.C., Timlin J.A. Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches. 2018;25(1):1234–1257. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

High K.A., Roncarolo M.G. Gene Therapy Engl J Med. 2019;381:455–464. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1706910. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Nayerossadat N., Maedeh T., Abas Ali P. Viral and nonviral delivery systems for gene delivery. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2012;1:27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Kaufmann K.B., Galy A., Schambach A., Grez M. Gene therapy on the move. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013;5(11):1642–1661. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

SYNBIO

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/what-synthetic-biology-comic-book

LEGAL DISCUSSION ON PATENTS OF “NATURAL” AND “SYNTHETIC” GENOMES | CELL LINES | SEQUENCES:

https://cip2.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2021/01/Forty-Years-Since-Diamond-v-Chakrabarty.pdfv

https://link.epo.org/web/publications/studies/en-patents-and-innovation-against-cancer-study.pdf

RESTORING THE GENETIC COMMONS: A “COMMON SENSE” APPROACH TO BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS IN THE WAKE OF KSR V. TELEFLEX

Anna Bartow Laakmann*

Cite as: Anna Bartow Laakmann, Restoring the Genetic Commons: A “Common Sense” Approach to Biotechnology Patents in the Wake of KSR v. Teleflex 14 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 43 (2007),

available at: https://www.mttlr.org/wp-content/journal/volfourteen/laakmann.pdf

Does §101 of the Patent Act allow patents on human genes?

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-398

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/576/

GATES, et al.

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/driven-extinction

Expand full comment

Tami - we have found that most MD’s do not know what is even in the vaxxxcenes. If you ask them they just say the CDC recommends it or you need to get it. Abysmal.

Expand full comment

It seems odd that many key figures from the "Medical Freedom Movement" just happen to be Zionists. Especially, since Israel used its population as pincushions for Pfizer.

Perhaps, genocidal bloodthirsty behavior is an untoward side effect of being repeatedly jabbed with mRNA gene therapy toxins.🤔

Expand full comment

I suspect that the zionists are trying to get rid of anyone who has actual Abrahamic genes. The people who have taken on the mantle of Judaism and are running that show, probably aren't themselves descendants. They're stealing Palestine from the original occupants, Jews and Muslkims alike.

Expand full comment

Most of those names ring true as limited hangouts; a couple took me by surprise, particularly Naomi Wolf. I guess we can't ever be too sure of anyone any more. The realization that none of these people is asking for repeal of the law that exempts pharma from liability is telling.

Expand full comment

Funny how Wolf always blames China🤔

Expand full comment

Basselhound - maybe as in China here in America equals Congress!

Expand full comment

😂👏

Expand full comment

No one should be surprised. Not a word is ever spoken about who started the entire mess to begin with, the 1962 Act that Jr’s uncle signed into law. I assume nothing will be done, carry on ignoring all these frauds is really all one must do. It’s important to call them out because no one should be following LEADERS. Holy moly, it’s how ever single catastrophic event happens.

Expand full comment

You have to get up pretty early in the morning to fool Mike!

Expand full comment

This conspicuously clumsy post as well as its convoluted comments thread exemplifies the following quote by the ever astute and inimitable Hannah Arendt - and demonstrates just how successful the ongoing deluge of propaganda has been to fog the mind of the masses - each of us clinging to bits of the 'truth' we've chosen to believe in, yet go on bickering with each other about the big picture - all the while, the Machine steadily descends, crushing dissent and free speech with impunity while we haggle!!! HELLO!!

DIVIDE AND CONQUER HAS NEVER BEEN SO EASY

"The moment we no longer have a free press, anything can happen. What makes it possible for a totalitarian or any other dictatorship to rule is that people are not informed; how can you have an opinion if you are not informed? If everybody always lies to you, the consequence is not that you believe the lies, but rather that nobody believes anything any longer. This is because lies, by their very nature, have to be changed, and a lying government has constantly to rewrite its own history. On the receiving end you get not only one lie—a lie which you could go on for the rest of your days—but you get a great number of lies, depending on how the political wind blows. And a people that no longer can believe anything cannot make up its mind. It is deprived not only of its capacity to act but also of its capacity to think and to judge. And with such a people you can then do what you please."

- Hannah Arendt, from an interview with Roger Errera in 1974

Expand full comment

Mike Yeadon really is in a league of one against the psychotic eugenicist ghouls getting high (and rich) on their roles in the Grand Culling Project.

Expand full comment

When eugenics is used in the context you disagree with, better to think of it as an heuristic for the sterilising, poisoning, maiming and mass murder taking place against the Gentiles. “Depop” would be a more accurate term, granted, but that is too broad a brush. Eugenics implies - albeit clumsily and imprecisely - that not only is depop in motion, but also improvement by virtue of the sterilising, poisoning, maiming and ultimately devastation from the human gene pool of a significant strata deemed inferior and targeted for removal.

In much the same way that blaming the WEF for our woes is to also be imprecise, this is a similar lexical misdirection to depop vs eugenics - “look over here, not there” - but one would never advocate for more WEF as a solution!

Expand full comment

There is no eugenics whatsoever involved in what the WEF and the governments linked with them are doing, the use of the careful seeding of the word eugenics in a heavily negative context in these discussions has got almost everyone using this term entirely inappropriately without fully realizing what is really happening.

This is not eugenics being implemented by the WEF, it is very clearly the precise opposite, what they are doing is actually intended on our total sterilization and extermination, there is no improvement of any of our genomes intended or being effected in the slightest, all you will see anywhere among all Gentile peoples is evidence only of sterilization and actual damage to the human genome of all Gentile peoples, that is what this is all really about, that is exactly what is really intended, and the programmed misuse of the word eugenic as a misnomer everywhere on the internet in an entirely mistaken negative context is intended only to rouse everyone up into a fever pitch intensity of actually suicidal hatred and revulsion against the very idea of eugenics so as to make people strongly oppose and reject it as if eugenics is actually really involved in what the WEF is doing and as if eugenics itself is actually something that would be intent on actually harming people.

Eugenics means to improve, it is what all natural and healthy species very naturally do in the wild to ensure that their young will be as fit as possible and face as little hardship and suffering in life as possible, but can you see any improvement going on after the ethnobomb COVID jabs, the babies born with half their bodies missing or half their faces missing after their mothers received Jewish-designed ethnobomb military weapon COVID jabs, the people getting their hands and feet chopped off with sepsis or dying, the permanent multi-generational irreparable genetic damage to the Gentile human races taking place?

None of this is actually eugenic in the slightest, all that is happening is not any improvment at all, but is only heavily destructive, being dysgenic or malgenic in reality, the precise opposite of eugenic.

If anything, it is eugenics that we actually need to repair the massive damage being done to our Gentile peoples and races, but when everyone is taught to hate and reject eugenics as necessarily negative and evil like some knee jerk reflex, then people will be strongly discouraged, and eugenics to renew and reinvigorate the Gentile human peoples and races will never happen, which is of course all actually part of the mind control plan of the Jewish-based Chabad Lubavitcher NWO/WEF NWO perps themselves whose simultaneous NWO plans are one and the same, to rid the world of billions of human beings, but the plot is laid bare when we consider that the Chabad Lubavitcher Noahide Law version involves only the removal of Gentile human beings, with the WEF agenda being a superficial overlay version covering over the basic Jewish military origin and real nature of this entire military agenda.

We actually need to adopt eugenics especially at this time now, and not to attack using eugenics, especially after all this lot has been happening to all Gentile races and peoples, and complaining vigorously against eugenics at this time is not only entirely inappropriate, it is simply suicidal.

Expand full comment

"I don’t think we ought to be mandating medical interventions for unwilling Americans unless we know precisely that that vaccine is going to end up helping them rather than hurting them."

1) He knows a 100% safe vax is an illusion, it doesn't exist and never will.

2) He said it in 2019 and things have changed dramatically since then, also for him. For myself back then I was still brainwashed with the idea that people who refused shots were mentally retarded & dismissing science. His views are progressing and will continue to progress...

For the rest I 100% support Yeadon and consider him to be the truth pioneer now dismissed by many who should know better but are falling for the lies of CO shills while paying with their health and fertility. It will only be a matter of time before even that comes to full light but first we get a repetition of heads in the sand & eyes and ears shut but now with this group. Time is needed (NOW is the time!) to get more people poisoned by IVM & other recommended toxins for their final goal to get full control on the breeding aspects of the human species. Big pharma by then has served its purpose to depopulate more than enough and can be burried.

I'm convinced the non-truthers will have a limited time left before also THAT house will collapse and there's nothing left to hold om but truth. But yeah... they won what they aimed for.

Expand full comment

So that clip supporting vaccination was made by statements from 2019? When you say his views are progressing and will continue to progress… Is he still pro vaccination? The statement that he made about forced vaccination, is that old footage, too? We don’t really know if he still believes that, do we? I would like to think that RFK Junior has refuted both of those positions. If he hasn’t then I would say that’s his position. He still harbors those views.

Expand full comment

This year and here (see link video below) RFK Jr. spoke on his position on vaccines, clarifying for those who still seem to misunderstand:

"I've never been anti-vaccine I've been saying, you can go back to a thousand statements I made over 20 years when people tried to apply that pejorative to me that I was anti-vaccine.

My position is that vaccine should be tested the same way for safety and efficacy the same way as all other medications. They are exempt from that kind of testing today, and that people should have informed consent 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗮 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲."

https://x.com/AV24org/status/1813331408116486200

Pretty clear, nah? ;)

Expand full comment

Good to know. Thank you, Mir.

Perhaps RFK Jr.’s statement means mandates are still OK and that “disagreement” must be expressed through exemptions for religious or medical reasons?

We saw many who were fired or not hired when their religious or medical exemptions were denied during and since Covid.

Requiring injection exemptions that can be rejected by “authorities” is continued slavery.

Expand full comment

I noticed his speech in the vid was cut short right after the important bold line I quoted in my last post. So I wanted to know what I missed... fox23 turned out to be inaccessible for people in the EU but I think I found it as a tweet, so what came next might tell a bit more or even why he 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰-𝘷𝘢𝘹𝘹𝘦𝘳, well I mean as an anti-vaxxer in power he prob. wouldn't be able to allow any shot.... :)

“I also believe that people should have informed consent, that people shouldn't be required to take a medical intervention with which they disagree.

If somebody wants a vaccine my presidency is going to do nothing to interfere with that.

I think most Americans, if they actually knew the way that I felt about this issue, 99.9% would agree with me. It's only that I've been portrayed and mischaracterized in a certain way because that’s a way to silence any debate about this important issue.”

https://x.com/mmcbridemd/status/1811910212087165143

Expand full comment

I wouldn't necessarily trust Mike, either. He could be the next level. Are all of these people paid by pharma or governments or both? Clearly the stakes are high if they are being paid a living wage to produce the content that they do.

Expand full comment

Mike is more the real deal than anyone I have ever met. I’ve known him well for a long time.

Expand full comment

Understandable but wrong. Mike is sound

Expand full comment

How do you know?

Expand full comment

Gut feel

Expand full comment

Hah

Expand full comment

By the third stage show with all the players and no action seemed pretty clear there was not a serious moment to consider with them.

Wonder how much they all made from their duped supporters?

Expand full comment

beware the pandemic treaty which is far from dead in the water as many wrongly assume..for the details check out recent posts on the james roguski substack

Expand full comment

Absolutely. The pandemic treaty is a nightmare.

Thank you, Clive.

Expand full comment

I think over and over again about the Hegelian Dialectic. They’re all playing a role! They don’t care which side we join, they just want us to submit and join. The end result will be loss of freedom and the way of life as we know it. I hear people tell me that if I don’t vote then don’t complain about the aftermath. As far as I’m concerned I won’t vote for evil PERIOD! There is no lesser of two evils with me! A lot of the names on the hangout list I woke up to a while back. We need to expose them all.

Expand full comment

Agreed!

Thank you, Lisa.

Expand full comment

and I believe “ someone” has gotten to Yeadon somehow/ someway and I no longer trust him.

Expand full comment

Hi Karen, I hope not.

It looks like someone got to Dr. McCullough between 2021-23, so I fear it happening to many.

https://hillmd.substack.com/p/dr-peter-mccullough-flip-flops-now

Expand full comment

McCullough used to whistle a very different tune early on. He spoke in stark terms - depop, cabals, crimes against humanity, scamdemic, institutional corruption etc, long before he did Joe Rogan and long before Mike Yeadon got to the same conclusions. Was visibly haunted by his dawning realisations. Then he flipped, went full on pro-conventional virology, early treatment, anti-parasitics, testing, contagion etc while still “these jabs bad but not all”, joined TWC and became an establishment shill masquerading as a MFM leader. The really paranoid position to take is that they’re all in on destabilising truth and reality to ultimately protect their foundational cornerstone that keeps on giving: scary invisible contagious pathogens.

Expand full comment

the various influencers are working out how to not get cancelled basically . they all choose different paths. Dr Buttar and many others are gone now because they said too much too soon . I said too much too soon so hardly anyone got to hear it. this is just reality .

Expand full comment

Good point, Yeowoman.

Expand full comment

I know Mike very well. You don’t know me but I’ll say anyway that if there is one person in the world I know is neither got-at nor gotattable it’s Mike Yeadon.

He is over the target and heavily censored in both Tier 1 AND Tier 2 media.

The Silver Bullet would slay the ‘medical’ beast if everyone shares it.

Its hoped everyone shares it with everyone they know - even the ‘hopeless cases’.

Today we publish it subtitled in many languages.

I know it’s good to try to suspect everyone but when people manage to ‘suspect’ Mike, I’m a bit suspicious about the integrity of their ‘suspiciousness’.

Expand full comment

Anyone who sells The Wellness Company kits is being paid by Mc C and god knows who else. Proceed with caution

Expand full comment

I would give my life for him. He has the only one who has never put a foot wrong.

I would suggest there are issues he has looked into very deeply that you have not analysed.

Do you have one single example of any one thing he has said that you object to?

Expand full comment

Take Note of everyone who does not talk about, or openly denies, the Nanotechnology.

+ Kirsch owns a Nano company that harvests your body’s energy for Crypto.

Expand full comment

Yes. Did see that. Who did these tests? When? Were those tests confirmed by independent labs. Who chose the vials to test? Random? How? What is the definition of mRNA (“manufactured” RNA); being a synthetic biology suite or “soup” of: Gene Drive Organisms GDOs, Human Artificial Chromosomes HACs, and existing patent rights over the engineered/manufactured “products” (i.e. “us”).

GDOs

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/gene-drive-organisms

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/black-box-biotechnology

HACs

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166075/

Grimes B.R., Monaco Z.L. Artificial and engineered chromosomes:developments and prospects for gene therapy. Chromosoma. 2005;4:230–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Lino C.A., Harper J.C., Carney J.C., Timlin J.A. Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches. 2018;25(1):1234–1257. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

High K.A., Roncarolo M.G. Gene Therapy Engl J Med. 2019;381:455–464. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1706910. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Nayerossadat N., Maedeh T., Abas Ali P. Viral and nonviral delivery systems for gene delivery. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2012;1:27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Kaufmann K.B., Galy A., Schambach A., Grez M. Gene therapy on the move. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013;5(11):1642–1661. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

SYNBIO

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/what-synthetic-biology-comic-book

LEGAL DISCUSSION ON PATENTS OF “NATURAL” AND “SYNTHETIC” GENOMES | CELL LINES | SEQUENCES:

https://cip2.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2021/01/Forty-Years-Since-Diamond-v-Chakrabarty.pdfv

https://link.epo.org/web/publications/studies/en-patents-and-innovation-against-cancer-study.pdf

RESTORING THE GENETIC COMMONS: A “COMMON SENSE” APPROACH TO BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS IN THE WAKE OF KSR V. TELEFLEX

Anna Bartow Laakmann*

Cite as: Anna Bartow Laakmann, Restoring the Genetic Commons: A “Common Sense” Approach to Biotechnology Patents in the Wake of KSR v. Teleflex 14 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 43 (2007),

available at: https://www.mttlr.org/wp-content/journal/volfourteen/laakmann.pdf

Does §101 of the Patent Act allow patents on human genes?

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-398

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/576/

GATES, et al.

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/driven-extinction

Expand full comment

Much appreciated, the limited hangouts list.

The obvious next question, who's on the not limited hangouts list? Presumably, James Hill, MD is there, and who else?

Expand full comment

Just imagine what happens when scientists insist on denying terrain theory. It's so convenient to abide by the germ theory diktat. As a consequence, I'd like the Baileys to flesh out their adherence to terrain theory by elucidating just how a "disease" starts if there's no such thing as contagion. What are the cardinal points to the argument that bacteria found in people are not causative to such "disease" entities?

Expand full comment

Yes. Did see that. Who did these tests? When? Were those tests confirmed by independent labs. Who chose the vials to test? Random? How? What is the definition of mRNA (“manufactured” RNA); being a synthetic biology suite or “soup” of: Gene Drive Organisms GDOs, Human Artificial Chromosomes HACs, and existing patent rights over the engineered/manufactured “products” (i.e. “us”).

GDOs

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/gene-drive-organisms

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/black-box-biotechnology

HACs

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166075/

Grimes B.R., Monaco Z.L. Artificial and engineered chromosomes:developments and prospects for gene therapy. Chromosoma. 2005;4:230–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Lino C.A., Harper J.C., Carney J.C., Timlin J.A. Delivering CRISPR: a review of the challenges and approaches. 2018;25(1):1234–1257. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1474964. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

High K.A., Roncarolo M.G. Gene Therapy Engl J Med. 2019;381:455–464. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1706910. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Nayerossadat N., Maedeh T., Abas Ali P. Viral and nonviral delivery systems for gene delivery. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2012;1:27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Kaufmann K.B., Galy A., Schambach A., Grez M. Gene therapy on the move. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013;5(11):1642–1661. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

SYNBIO

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/what-synthetic-biology-comic-book

LEGAL DISCUSSION ON PATENTS OF “NATURAL” AND “SYNTHETIC” GENOMES | CELL LINES | SEQUENCES:

https://cip2.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2021/01/Forty-Years-Since-Diamond-v-Chakrabarty.pdfv

https://link.epo.org/web/publications/studies/en-patents-and-innovation-against-cancer-study.pdf

RESTORING THE GENETIC COMMONS: A “COMMON SENSE” APPROACH TO BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS IN THE WAKE OF KSR V. TELEFLEX

Anna Bartow Laakmann*

Cite as: Anna Bartow Laakmann, Restoring the Genetic Commons: A “Common Sense” Approach to Biotechnology Patents in the Wake of KSR v. Teleflex 14 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 43 (2007),

available at: https://www.mttlr.org/wp-content/journal/volfourteen/laakmann.pdf

Does §101 of the Patent Act allow patents on human genes?

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-398

Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/576/

GATES, et al.

https://www.etcgroup.org/content/driven-extinction

Expand full comment