“Revolution” requires “wiping out” professionals, everyone with cultural memory who can resist “the new order,” explains venture investor physicist (Updated 10/3/24)
Correct. And the petulant and stubborn will feel satisfied in having their tantrums and doing nothing else.
The world is full of all kinds of people who are positioned, funded, praised, honored, awarded, highlighted, promoted and gushed over simply for telling us only part of what we want to hear and then are able to steer us here or there as the Powers so desire after we have been hornswoggled once again.
The remedy for this is to up our intellectual game, to think with imagination and eagerness to explore, to demand of ourselves that we not just complain---but that we execute willful agency.
He was a "B.A.R. Attorney. BAR stands for "British Accreditation Registry" !
They have to be "Registered" in England to practice law in "America"??? Lawyers and Attorneys are "agents" of the Admiralty Maritime (International seas) court system brought to our land jurisdiction by the deep state to control "We the People" without "full disclosure or our consent.
I agree with your statement. I have a law degree, but no BAR affiliation and will never be a part of that. The courts don't allow anyone to practice nowadays without that BAR approval, unless you are representing yourself.
Okay. But even "tools" must say some accurate things once in a while to maintain credibility and to possess "hook."
Why is he positioned to be speaking? I think we all know. I have been saying much of this stuff since 1985 and I grew in my own clarity about things over the decades. I am no mason. Believe me, NEITHER Peter Thiel (nor anyone else) is sending me checks. [See what a difference a typo with the omission of a negating conjunction makes?]
I remember reading somewhere about when the killing was going on in Cambodia the killers honed in on people that wore glasses. It turns out people that do not need glasses when younger develop vision problems as they gobble up their reading matter. Glasses distinguish smart people from the crowd. People that wear glasses are likely reservoirs of culture and technological know how. Prime candidates for extermination. Your Mileage May Vary. But I wear glasses and I know stuff.
I think some of his opinions may be similar to what a controlled op would say, but if you listen to enough of his expositions, it is certainly not all of it.
We can also hear the echo of 'build back better' in 'unburdened by what has been'. Communists never really invent anything. They copy forms of institutional structure that are useful, and destroy everything else. And everyone that does not go along with their plans. They might save their most vicious retaliations for them.
Whether Kamala is smart or not, she--or more accurately the machine for which she is a face--is an absolute menace that must be denied power on November 5. Vote accordingly.
Dear right-thinking American citizens, vote at the polling place, not from a Cheetos-littered sofa griping about how "there is no difference between the parties," or "voting makes you culpable for perpetuating the myth of democracy." All of those critiques do have some merit, but--nonetheless--vote. Your responsibility for how we got to this point where elections are so troubled and the results so dubious goes far back in time---and yes, you Mr. Griper, are responsible (see Cheetos reference above). The time for fixing the problems that the nihilist gripers complain about was 1945, at least. Now, we have to navigate a rinky rowboat between jagged rocks in turbulent, violent rapids. Turning times arrow from backward to forward, if Mr. Trump is indeed able to bar Kamala from the White House, our labors have only just begun. (No, please do not cue up a Carpenters' song.) We have lost this culture because cowardly, neutered, anti-intellectual Europeans have believed the genocidal rot that the Marxists, the SSRI-besotted feminists and the assortment of other anti-natalist, family-hating well-organized or motivated menaces have pumped into their brains from the beginning of the erection of the stone monolith, television, because it was easy to be lazy, watch football, and eat sausages from the grill. Being a real Citizen takes relentless effort. Dreaming about extravagant vacations, cushy retirements, forever laying on the beach and all that silly nonsense are not honorable goals in life. Forever maintaining civilization is what real men and real women do. It is satisfying enough.
Please provide evidence that voting matters. Is Trump better than Kamala? The time was way before 1945. I seriously doubt anyone on this board eats cheetos. T Voting has been fixed for centuries. Mark Twain said if voting mattered, they wouldn't let you do it. Do you really believe in every race everywhere, it's always 49% to 51%?
How exactly does voting help our current situation?
I think we risk becoming SO cynical and suspicious (not unjustly so, I have to admit, after the last 4 years) that we begin discounting every thing and every one as 'controlled opposition' and throw out the baby with the bathwater.
This entire interview was one of the best things I've seen in the last 5 years.
It covered a lot of ground.
Whether one thinks Eric Weinstein is 'controlled op' or not, it offered up some interesting insights.
I think we do ourselves a major disservice in our rush to discount all of what was said.
No one will ever agree with everything another says, particularly over a conversation as long as this one was, but we should be able to entertain two opposing thoughts, and still see value in someone else's experiences and opinions.
A circular firing squad is equally as useless as an echo chamber.
Same. I was only briefly familiar with the lesser-known Weinstein, but this was riveting.
(And in an age of 2 minute TikTok attention spans, for this to keep me, and thousands of others, fully invested for over 3 hours says much).
It got 6.2 million views for good reason.
Just the breadth and depth of his knowledge, his insights, his interview style of constantly tossing the ball back to his interviewer (who, for a relatively young man, was no slouch himself) gave me a whole new respect for both.
Let me start by saying, I'm not voting for Kamala/Obama or the faux populist Orange Idiot. Secondly, Eric Weinstein is a bloviated Peter Thiel tool.😁
Weinstein seems correct in this clip, though.
Correct. And the petulant and stubborn will feel satisfied in having their tantrums and doing nothing else.
The world is full of all kinds of people who are positioned, funded, praised, honored, awarded, highlighted, promoted and gushed over simply for telling us only part of what we want to hear and then are able to steer us here or there as the Powers so desire after we have been hornswoggled once again.
The remedy for this is to up our intellectual game, to think with imagination and eagerness to explore, to demand of ourselves that we not just complain---but that we execute willful agency.
Any criminal can make an eternally acceptable quote.
We eternally quote hundreds.
Be careful not exposing this truth. Churchill, Kissinger, Einstein, FDR, Ben Franklin.
They've all committed crimes against humanity yet we quote their one (or two or three) statements, falsely blanketing over their inhumane actions.
YES, and don't forget about the British Agent, Abraham Lincoln!!!
Do you have any sources for that, please? I'm not doubting, I just want to see the source material.
He was a "B.A.R. Attorney. BAR stands for "British Accreditation Registry" !
They have to be "Registered" in England to practice law in "America"??? Lawyers and Attorneys are "agents" of the Admiralty Maritime (International seas) court system brought to our land jurisdiction by the deep state to control "We the People" without "full disclosure or our consent.
We are definitely not a "free country".
I agree with your statement. I have a law degree, but no BAR affiliation and will never be a part of that. The courts don't allow anyone to practice nowadays without that BAR approval, unless you are representing yourself.
Okay. But even "tools" must say some accurate things once in a while to maintain credibility and to possess "hook."
Why is he positioned to be speaking? I think we all know. I have been saying much of this stuff since 1985 and I grew in my own clarity about things over the decades. I am no mason. Believe me, NEITHER Peter Thiel (nor anyone else) is sending me checks. [See what a difference a typo with the omission of a negating conjunction makes?]
Will you pay attention to me?
Lord, make my words sweet, in case I am forced to eat them.
Me neither 😉…
Well, that was easy.
I remember reading somewhere about when the killing was going on in Cambodia the killers honed in on people that wore glasses. It turns out people that do not need glasses when younger develop vision problems as they gobble up their reading matter. Glasses distinguish smart people from the crowd. People that wear glasses are likely reservoirs of culture and technological know how. Prime candidates for extermination. Your Mileage May Vary. But I wear glasses and I know stuff.
Didn’t know that.
So evil.
Thank you, tanzenkran.
Weinstein is a controlled op.
I think some of his opinions may be similar to what a controlled op would say, but if you listen to enough of his expositions, it is certainly not all of it.
We can also hear the echo of 'build back better' in 'unburdened by what has been'. Communists never really invent anything. They copy forms of institutional structure that are useful, and destroy everything else. And everyone that does not go along with their plans. They might save their most vicious retaliations for them.
Whether Kamala is smart or not, she--or more accurately the machine for which she is a face--is an absolute menace that must be denied power on November 5. Vote accordingly.
Dear right-thinking American citizens, vote at the polling place, not from a Cheetos-littered sofa griping about how "there is no difference between the parties," or "voting makes you culpable for perpetuating the myth of democracy." All of those critiques do have some merit, but--nonetheless--vote. Your responsibility for how we got to this point where elections are so troubled and the results so dubious goes far back in time---and yes, you Mr. Griper, are responsible (see Cheetos reference above). The time for fixing the problems that the nihilist gripers complain about was 1945, at least. Now, we have to navigate a rinky rowboat between jagged rocks in turbulent, violent rapids. Turning times arrow from backward to forward, if Mr. Trump is indeed able to bar Kamala from the White House, our labors have only just begun. (No, please do not cue up a Carpenters' song.) We have lost this culture because cowardly, neutered, anti-intellectual Europeans have believed the genocidal rot that the Marxists, the SSRI-besotted feminists and the assortment of other anti-natalist, family-hating well-organized or motivated menaces have pumped into their brains from the beginning of the erection of the stone monolith, television, because it was easy to be lazy, watch football, and eat sausages from the grill. Being a real Citizen takes relentless effort. Dreaming about extravagant vacations, cushy retirements, forever laying on the beach and all that silly nonsense are not honorable goals in life. Forever maintaining civilization is what real men and real women do. It is satisfying enough.
(Thanks, Dr. Hill, for posting this interview.)
Please provide evidence that voting matters. Is Trump better than Kamala? The time was way before 1945. I seriously doubt anyone on this board eats cheetos. T Voting has been fixed for centuries. Mark Twain said if voting mattered, they wouldn't let you do it. Do you really believe in every race everywhere, it's always 49% to 51%?
How exactly does voting help our current situation?
EVIDENCE FOR VOTING: All the heritage Americans that did not vote in 2020 and, thus, who enabled the steal to be possible.
And, believe me, I abhor the idea that simply voting is sufficient for preserving a nation and the republic.
I think it is tragically obvious to us that most people do not listen to what “they” are telling us. Or they listen but do not hear.
Weinstein is a Mason, of course.
I also interpret Harris’ statement in the same way: she is referring to bringing in the New World “Ordo” ab Chao.
What will happen to ‘dissenters’, especially Patriots?
Listen to “David Goldberg’s Final Words”.
‘They’ have been using the internet to identify their ‘enemies’ for years.
The only thing that remains to be seen is whether they use native enforcers or proxies to do their dirty work.
The Weinstein brothers are big controlled opposition, they aren't truthers.
I wouldn’t doubt it, though I think Eric is onto something in this interview.
I agree totally
I think we risk becoming SO cynical and suspicious (not unjustly so, I have to admit, after the last 4 years) that we begin discounting every thing and every one as 'controlled opposition' and throw out the baby with the bathwater.
This entire interview was one of the best things I've seen in the last 5 years.
It covered a lot of ground.
Whether one thinks Eric Weinstein is 'controlled op' or not, it offered up some interesting insights.
I think we do ourselves a major disservice in our rush to discount all of what was said.
No one will ever agree with everything another says, particularly over a conversation as long as this one was, but we should be able to entertain two opposing thoughts, and still see value in someone else's experiences and opinions.
A circular firing squad is equally as useless as an echo chamber.
Well said.
Agree it was an amazing interview. I wasn’t too familiar with Eric’s work before this, and I developed much respect for his saying these things.
Same. I was only briefly familiar with the lesser-known Weinstein, but this was riveting.
(And in an age of 2 minute TikTok attention spans, for this to keep me, and thousands of others, fully invested for over 3 hours says much).
It got 6.2 million views for good reason.
Just the breadth and depth of his knowledge, his insights, his interview style of constantly tossing the ball back to his interviewer (who, for a relatively young man, was no slouch himself) gave me a whole new respect for both.
Time very well spent.
I definitely came away wiser than when I went in.
Totally agree.
Thank you for your thoughtful comments.
Dr. Hill, maybe we should do a podcast--better yet a videocast--together sometime soon, may in a week?
Hi David, please DM me.
Done.
Okay, as soon as I can wade through the gibberish of useless Substack instructions and figure out where to click, I will do! Thanks.
I'll definitely watch that if it happens.
I am sorry, Monica, if what happens? The election?