We need to stop simping to our overlords for exemptions to coerced shot and mask mandates that do more harm than good, say researchers (Updated 9/28//24)
Aug 21, 2022·edited Aug 21, 2022Liked by James Hill, MD
Very true and very well said. It's appalling how passive Americans have become in the face of tyrants.
Why? Because they've been trained to obey in schools; they have been systematically confused by ideology; they have lost touch with physical, tangible reality.
If you don't like how such people "simp" to their overlords, just wait. Just wait fot the metaverse, where control of minds, obedience to their dictates, and the continual narrative entrainment will be complete. Why? Because there will literally be nothing outside that. Nothing else will exist. THAT is what the metaverse is.
Your son, Dr Hill? You should be proud of him, of course. Which you no doubt are. I hope he has the strength to continue to resist.
The answer to all of this is, we really need to create communities outside of this. There really is no other way.
Amen. There are more of us than them, and as soon as people realize this it stop tonight. I'll never bow. Been through a lot worse. We all must stand united. Period. No more of the insanity.
Aug 21, 2022·edited Aug 21, 2022Liked by James Hill, MD
I have not and would not seek an exemption. Because an exemption means I would have accepted this wholeheartedly BUT FOR one (medical or religious) reason.
NO. I have had to cancel trips and educational opportunities instead of seeking an exemption. And each time I gave them a piece of my mind.
On the bright side, your son now knows he should never consider working for a company that is linked in any way to the WEF and the Great Reset agenda ;)
Aug 20, 2022·edited Aug 20, 2022Liked by James Hill, MD
When I first heard about 'vaccine mandates' my immediate thought was, "How long until someone shoots the bozos pushing this literal Nazi policy?" Oddly, that did not happen. People seem to have forgotten about Nazism and the Nuremberg Code and have accepted such outrages against basic human rights and decency. Many of my own liberal former friends have gone 'full Nazi' on this issue. Despite the evidence and facts all being against them, they aren't backing down one iota.
This is clearly an issue of such desperately vital human rights importance that it's worth overthrowing any government that does this, by any means necessary. I say this as someone who was formerly a pro-government pacifist. I choose civil war over mandated injections - and I'm willing to fight and die for this belief. Furthermore, I'm putting CSIS and FBI on notice that I feel this way, right now, with this comment. Got that, FBI and CSIS? It's basic self defense for the intended victims of genocide to fight back and kill government officials who try to push genocide on them. FBI & CSIS are aligned with genocidal governments, much like the historical Gestapo. My primary hesitations on this violent approach are:
#1 I know how horrid civil war is. It's the worst thing that can happen to a country. Eliminating Nazis who are forcing genocide shots on people is worth civil war. Not much else is. As this is a case of Nazis forcing genocide shots, civil war is clearly called for. Got that, CSIS and FBI?
#2 WEF is TRYING to provoke civil war in many countries at once. It's obviously part of their plan. Given that provoking violent civil war is the WEF plan, we must not give them the violence they seek. That said, WEF's approach to provoking civil war is similar to the USA's approach to provoking the Ukraine war: get your Nazi allies to constantly commit genocidal atrocities until people fight back, then accuse them of attacking you!
#3 Historical studies on how to defeat totalitarianism place "building parallel societies" as more likely to succeed than warfare. Violence only has about a 50% track record against totalitarianism. I'd like to go with whatever strategy yields the highest chance of strategic success.
#4 Given all this information, I believe it's best to try a nonviolent approach towards stopping this new bout of totalitarianism. That said, if groups of people start trying to kill off all members of the WEF then I wish them all the luck in the world. Every WEF member killed is one fewer person pushing genocide.
We'll likely see Germany hit a flash point this winter. Germans will be desperate for food and warmth this winter. Germany seems intent on forcing injections every 90 days. Presumably the German government will only provide warmth and food to the freshly 'vaccinated'. German citizens are disarmed. That said, Germans have a better chance of survival if they attempt to overthrow the German government. If they don't attempt this they will die. If they try and fail at this they will die. Their only chance at survival is to overthrow the German government and replace it with something not controlled by genocidal Nazis.
I agree nonviolent resistance is the best thing to try.
It’s sad what’s happening to Germany, a indicator of who’s behind this. It’s spreading throughout Europe, the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
It seems when one hears the word “nazi” in the media, there are almost always lies and deception behind it, so I’m reluctant to attribute anything to that label. Its meaning often shifts too, leading to confusion.
Is there an example of a parallel society being enough to defeat totalitarianism? I certainly prefer that plan and have prepared for it, am heartened to see the beginnings of parallel financial structures like the anti-ESG DRLL, Peter Thiel's new unhackable phones, Lindell's new retailer to rival Amazon, Truth, Gab and Gettr, etc. Though I am also aware that once they come for our cash, bartering will carry hefty penalties, and as Xiden so psychotically likes to remind us, we have guns and he has nukes and fighter jets. If parallel society has flourished in the face of past totalitarianism, it would be good to learn from that.
Yes, YYR, there are historical examples of totalitarianism being defeated by parallel structures. See the works of Vaclev Havel, who went from Soviet dissident to President of Czechoslovakia. See the works of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (i.e. The Gulag Archipeligo, etc), who took on Soviet totalitarianism and won. For insight into the case of Nazi Germany read the works of Joost Meerloo, particularly "The Rape of the Mind" . Meerloo survived extended torture by the Gestapo.
Nazi Germany was defeated militarily, but not until it had killed many millions.
For a light weight video overview over this topic see this video:
You say tomato I say tomato. You say 'genocidal Marxists' I say 'genocidal Nazis'. We're both wrong. Perhaps most accurate to call them 'genocidal technocratic totalitarians'. That draws nicely from the history of both 'genocidal Marxists' and genocidal Nazis' to elicit something more dystopian than either. What do you think?
This is what struck me as real sinister. The exemptions are specifically worded to force you to bow down to the narrative, first by calling it a vaccine. Then go through a ruthless, intrusive inquisition committee whose goal is to humiliate.
It's reminiscent of the Cambodia classrooms, where you'd spend all day fervently pleading your utter loyalty to Pol-pot, only to still get shot in the end.
I too lost my profession in my 40s, single parent, child entering college, lots of other stresses. Still too reeling with trauma to start picking up the pieces.
Best wishes for your courageous son. We're in a battle of the ages.
Thanks for the suggestion, bankangle. I’ll let my son know about the EEOC complaint possibility.
Fortunately, he moved on and found another job in the finance industry that doesn’t require the shot. Hopefully that will turn out better in the long run.
Aug 21, 2022·edited Aug 21, 2022Liked by James Hill, MD
I can tell you that in certain blue states, given recent rulings (2016-forward), the employer, particularly in medical sectors, has a very low bar for validly claiming "undue hardship." Like that bar is considered de minimus. Point being, they control the courts at most levels too. So you have to move or change jobs. In many states, that's the current harsh reality.
We can presumably also sue vaccine companies if we can prove fraud or other intentional torts; these are exceptions to their liability immunity under the PREP Act and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Please don't make me risk death, please don't make me risk death....
This is not how an American acts. The founders would be appalled.
Absolutely, John.
Very true and very well said. It's appalling how passive Americans have become in the face of tyrants.
Why? Because they've been trained to obey in schools; they have been systematically confused by ideology; they have lost touch with physical, tangible reality.
If you don't like how such people "simp" to their overlords, just wait. Just wait fot the metaverse, where control of minds, obedience to their dictates, and the continual narrative entrainment will be complete. Why? Because there will literally be nothing outside that. Nothing else will exist. THAT is what the metaverse is.
Your son, Dr Hill? You should be proud of him, of course. Which you no doubt are. I hope he has the strength to continue to resist.
The answer to all of this is, we really need to create communities outside of this. There really is no other way.
Subsidiarity. Exactly right... They can control 200 countries... But 10,000 towns?
Amen. There are more of us than them, and as soon as people realize this it stop tonight. I'll never bow. Been through a lot worse. We all must stand united. Period. No more of the insanity.
Yes. Stay strong, Kev.
I have not and would not seek an exemption. Because an exemption means I would have accepted this wholeheartedly BUT FOR one (medical or religious) reason.
NO. I have had to cancel trips and educational opportunities instead of seeking an exemption. And each time I gave them a piece of my mind.
Excellent, Rose!
On the bright side, your son now knows he should never consider working for a company that is linked in any way to the WEF and the Great Reset agenda ;)
Quite so, Chris.
When I first heard about 'vaccine mandates' my immediate thought was, "How long until someone shoots the bozos pushing this literal Nazi policy?" Oddly, that did not happen. People seem to have forgotten about Nazism and the Nuremberg Code and have accepted such outrages against basic human rights and decency. Many of my own liberal former friends have gone 'full Nazi' on this issue. Despite the evidence and facts all being against them, they aren't backing down one iota.
This is clearly an issue of such desperately vital human rights importance that it's worth overthrowing any government that does this, by any means necessary. I say this as someone who was formerly a pro-government pacifist. I choose civil war over mandated injections - and I'm willing to fight and die for this belief. Furthermore, I'm putting CSIS and FBI on notice that I feel this way, right now, with this comment. Got that, FBI and CSIS? It's basic self defense for the intended victims of genocide to fight back and kill government officials who try to push genocide on them. FBI & CSIS are aligned with genocidal governments, much like the historical Gestapo. My primary hesitations on this violent approach are:
#1 I know how horrid civil war is. It's the worst thing that can happen to a country. Eliminating Nazis who are forcing genocide shots on people is worth civil war. Not much else is. As this is a case of Nazis forcing genocide shots, civil war is clearly called for. Got that, CSIS and FBI?
#2 WEF is TRYING to provoke civil war in many countries at once. It's obviously part of their plan. Given that provoking violent civil war is the WEF plan, we must not give them the violence they seek. That said, WEF's approach to provoking civil war is similar to the USA's approach to provoking the Ukraine war: get your Nazi allies to constantly commit genocidal atrocities until people fight back, then accuse them of attacking you!
#3 Historical studies on how to defeat totalitarianism place "building parallel societies" as more likely to succeed than warfare. Violence only has about a 50% track record against totalitarianism. I'd like to go with whatever strategy yields the highest chance of strategic success.
#4 Given all this information, I believe it's best to try a nonviolent approach towards stopping this new bout of totalitarianism. That said, if groups of people start trying to kill off all members of the WEF then I wish them all the luck in the world. Every WEF member killed is one fewer person pushing genocide.
We'll likely see Germany hit a flash point this winter. Germans will be desperate for food and warmth this winter. Germany seems intent on forcing injections every 90 days. Presumably the German government will only provide warmth and food to the freshly 'vaccinated'. German citizens are disarmed. That said, Germans have a better chance of survival if they attempt to overthrow the German government. If they don't attempt this they will die. If they try and fail at this they will die. Their only chance at survival is to overthrow the German government and replace it with something not controlled by genocidal Nazis.
Thank you, Bruce, for your thoughtful comment.
I agree nonviolent resistance is the best thing to try.
It’s sad what’s happening to Germany, a indicator of who’s behind this. It’s spreading throughout Europe, the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
It seems when one hears the word “nazi” in the media, there are almost always lies and deception behind it, so I’m reluctant to attribute anything to that label. Its meaning often shifts too, leading to confusion.
Is there an example of a parallel society being enough to defeat totalitarianism? I certainly prefer that plan and have prepared for it, am heartened to see the beginnings of parallel financial structures like the anti-ESG DRLL, Peter Thiel's new unhackable phones, Lindell's new retailer to rival Amazon, Truth, Gab and Gettr, etc. Though I am also aware that once they come for our cash, bartering will carry hefty penalties, and as Xiden so psychotically likes to remind us, we have guns and he has nukes and fighter jets. If parallel society has flourished in the face of past totalitarianism, it would be good to learn from that.
Yes, YYR, there are historical examples of totalitarianism being defeated by parallel structures. See the works of Vaclev Havel, who went from Soviet dissident to President of Czechoslovakia. See the works of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (i.e. The Gulag Archipeligo, etc), who took on Soviet totalitarianism and won. For insight into the case of Nazi Germany read the works of Joost Meerloo, particularly "The Rape of the Mind" . Meerloo survived extended torture by the Gestapo.
Nazi Germany was defeated militarily, but not until it had killed many millions.
For a light weight video overview over this topic see this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09maaUaRT4M
You say tomato I say tomato. You say 'genocidal Marxists' I say 'genocidal Nazis'. We're both wrong. Perhaps most accurate to call them 'genocidal technocratic totalitarians'. That draws nicely from the history of both 'genocidal Marxists' and genocidal Nazis' to elicit something more dystopian than either. What do you think?
Agreed! genocidal, technocratic, *globalist*, totalitarians it is!
This message needs to be heard much farther and wider than any audience on Substack, and it has to resonate with, literally, billions of sheeple.
Thank you, Joe.
I wish I knew how to reach a wider audience.
This is what struck me as real sinister. The exemptions are specifically worded to force you to bow down to the narrative, first by calling it a vaccine. Then go through a ruthless, intrusive inquisition committee whose goal is to humiliate.
It's reminiscent of the Cambodia classrooms, where you'd spend all day fervently pleading your utter loyalty to Pol-pot, only to still get shot in the end.
I too lost my profession in my 40s, single parent, child entering college, lots of other stresses. Still too reeling with trauma to start picking up the pieces.
Best wishes for your courageous son. We're in a battle of the ages.
Great points, Kimjy. I’m seeing the same things.
Sorry to hear of your situation.
It’s good you’re resisting the coercion, though.
Thanks for the suggestion, bankangle. I’ll let my son know about the EEOC complaint possibility.
Fortunately, he moved on and found another job in the finance industry that doesn’t require the shot. Hopefully that will turn out better in the long run.
I can tell you that in certain blue states, given recent rulings (2016-forward), the employer, particularly in medical sectors, has a very low bar for validly claiming "undue hardship." Like that bar is considered de minimus. Point being, they control the courts at most levels too. So you have to move or change jobs. In many states, that's the current harsh reality.
Unfortunate but true. Thank you, David.
Illinois jury awarded $10.6m to fired and penalized hospital HCWs.
Yes, a very good sign. There are a few of those. More coming one hopes.
That is excellent.
We can presumably also sue vaccine companies if we can prove fraud or other intentional torts; these are exceptions to their liability immunity under the PREP Act and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
Rather terrifying. It’s difficult to find such information. Thank you.
That’s great. Feel free to send me anything significant at jhmd (at) proton.me.
Astute observations, Spiro.