Considering the majority of financing and funding is from those engaged in a profiteering racket, who will be funding independent scientists and doctors to produce publications that will get published? Furthermore, which publications are also compromised by a system that has given pestilence profiteering a free license to manufacture with zero liability even for fraud?
It isn’t profiteering that’s the problem. Non profits fund scientific research and produce publications too with zero liability. The problem is occurring because we have bad laws favorable to cronyism.
Every other pharmaceutical product states side effects on a commercial.
The only side affects we have heard of on MSM are minor, like a sore arm.
A friends armpits swelled up so badly it looked like he was trying to smuggle large grapefruits. Despite being very “pro”, he went to the urgent care… and was laughed at, LAUGHED at. The doctor treated him like he was being overly dramatic. That is not how doctors should act. He was scared enough to go the urgent care, something he hates to do. He’s the kind of guy that doesn’t even like taking Tylenol.
The behavior is disgusting in the “pro” community.
Birth rates are down and excess deaths are up. And they have even admitted that it wasn’t even tested for transmission before it’s roll out. How is this legal?!
Fear is a might motivator and it was peddled hard from the onset of the p(l)andemic. Instead of being fearful, I began seeking information. By August of 2020 I had learned enough to realize Covid was an opportunity to be exploited. It took another year until I was able to learn exactly what it meant. There was never a need for a "vaccine" for Covid, there were plenty of early treatments available. After doing more reading, I am inclined to believe there has been no need to 95% of the "vaccines" that are pushed by the U.S. medical industry.
Don't you think that a full and independently verified list of ingredients ought to have been published?
Vials tested by independent researchers in several countries have found the vaccines contain some extremely toxic ingredients which behave like self-assembly nano-particulates and even minute parasites.
UK MHRA admitted to me, in emails Dec 2020 that the Pfizer vaccines they had just approved contained a SYNTHETIC COMPUTER GENERATED RECOMBINANT GENETIC SEQUENCE suspended and encased in an equally synthetic lipid nano-particulate.
When I published the email exchange on Twitter I was immediately banned for life from that social media platform. Facebook and Discord followed suit a year later.
If my information had been properly investigated instead of shut down MILLIONS OF PEOPLE would never have risked their lives by permitting themselves to be injected with this muck.
Here is the 4th edition of that original article which you should have seen but couldn't due to cancel culture.
Yes. Ingredients should always be listed. However there were manufacturing issues and poor quality control in both production and storage of the vaccines. Even the way the vaccines were administered was critical to how much damage a person sustained from the jab. When you put everything together you can’t help but come to the conclusion that the totality of the situation became one of “depraved indifference.” LeeLasik is the author where I read that term. There is no accountability at any point in the process because we have bad laws protecting a system instead of protecting the individual. Run 🏃🏼♀️ when you hear people say this is for the greater good! It was a lie that you were going to save granny if you got the jab.
"How can leaders demonstrate to the public a vaccine is safe"
Remove the bogus liability shield for Pfizer!
When Pfizer has some skin in the game then they might stop killing people with the toxxine, but definitely not until then.
Absolutely correct! Assume toxic or deadly until otherwise proven.
Food for thought
Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of
G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35436552/
This demonstrates prion-like capabilities of the spike protein:
Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.2c03925
Nydström, S.; Hammarström, P. Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV2 spike
protein. J Am Chem Soc 2022; 144: 8945-8950. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03925.
This shows upregulation of alpha synuclein and increased risk to
Parkinson's disease:
SARS-CoV-2 Proteins Interact with Alpha Synuclein and Induce Lewy Body-like Pathology In Vitro
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35328814/
Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Z., Ma, K. SARS-CoV-2 proteins interact with
alpha synuclein and induce Lewy body-like pathology in vitro. Int J Mol
Sci 2022; 23: 3394. doi: 10.3390/ijms23063394
This is an important paper showing that the spike protein activates toll
like receptor 4, which leads to a strong inflammatory response.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with and activates TLR41
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41422-021-00495-9
This shows that spike subunit S1 alone is neurotoxic:
SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 subunit induces neuroinflammatory, microglial and behavioral sickness responses: Evidence of PAMP-like properties
Frank, M.G.; Nguyen, K.H.; Ball, J.B.; Hopkins, S.; Kelley, T.; Baratta,
M.V.; Fleshner, M.; Maier, S.F.; SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 subunit induces
neuroinflammatory, microglial and behavioral sickness responses:
Evidence of PAMP-like properties. Brain Behav Immun 2022; 100: 267-277.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.007.
Spike still present several months after injections:
SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein Persistence in SARS-CoV-2 Negative Post-Vaccination Individuals with Long COVID/ PASC-Like Symptoms
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1844677/v1
Patterson, B.K.; Francisco, E.B.; Yogendra, R.; Long, E.; Pise, A.;
Beaty, C.; Osgood, E.; Bream, J.; Kreimer, M.; Heide, R.V.;
Guevara-Coto, J.; Mora-Rodríguez R.A.; Mora, J. SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein
persistence in SARS-CoV-2 negative post-vaccination individuals with
long COVID/ PASC-like symptoms. Research Square Preprint. Jul 12, 2022.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1844677/v1.
Considering the majority of financing and funding is from those engaged in a profiteering racket, who will be funding independent scientists and doctors to produce publications that will get published? Furthermore, which publications are also compromised by a system that has given pestilence profiteering a free license to manufacture with zero liability even for fraud?
It isn’t profiteering that’s the problem. Non profits fund scientific research and produce publications too with zero liability. The problem is occurring because we have bad laws favorable to cronyism.
Your premise is false. Many have found the correlation, and many have found causal pathways.
You've just moved the goalposts. Not playing your game.
Do you understand that you excercised the illegitimate tactic of changing goalposts?
Every other pharmaceutical product states side effects on a commercial.
The only side affects we have heard of on MSM are minor, like a sore arm.
A friends armpits swelled up so badly it looked like he was trying to smuggle large grapefruits. Despite being very “pro”, he went to the urgent care… and was laughed at, LAUGHED at. The doctor treated him like he was being overly dramatic. That is not how doctors should act. He was scared enough to go the urgent care, something he hates to do. He’s the kind of guy that doesn’t even like taking Tylenol.
The behavior is disgusting in the “pro” community.
Birth rates are down and excess deaths are up. And they have even admitted that it wasn’t even tested for transmission before it’s roll out. How is this legal?!
horrific, hope he reports to VAERS
Fear is a might motivator and it was peddled hard from the onset of the p(l)andemic. Instead of being fearful, I began seeking information. By August of 2020 I had learned enough to realize Covid was an opportunity to be exploited. It took another year until I was able to learn exactly what it meant. There was never a need for a "vaccine" for Covid, there were plenty of early treatments available. After doing more reading, I am inclined to believe there has been no need to 95% of the "vaccines" that are pushed by the U.S. medical industry.
Don't you think that a full and independently verified list of ingredients ought to have been published?
Vials tested by independent researchers in several countries have found the vaccines contain some extremely toxic ingredients which behave like self-assembly nano-particulates and even minute parasites.
UK MHRA admitted to me, in emails Dec 2020 that the Pfizer vaccines they had just approved contained a SYNTHETIC COMPUTER GENERATED RECOMBINANT GENETIC SEQUENCE suspended and encased in an equally synthetic lipid nano-particulate.
When I published the email exchange on Twitter I was immediately banned for life from that social media platform. Facebook and Discord followed suit a year later.
If my information had been properly investigated instead of shut down MILLIONS OF PEOPLE would never have risked their lives by permitting themselves to be injected with this muck.
Here is the 4th edition of that original article which you should have seen but couldn't due to cancel culture.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/sarscov2-mrna-is-synthetic
and here is my archive of supporting articles written since:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/all-my-substack-articles-on-emfc19
I hope you and your readers will take the time to fully appreciate how important they are.
Yes. Ingredients should always be listed. However there were manufacturing issues and poor quality control in both production and storage of the vaccines. Even the way the vaccines were administered was critical to how much damage a person sustained from the jab. When you put everything together you can’t help but come to the conclusion that the totality of the situation became one of “depraved indifference.” LeeLasik is the author where I read that term. There is no accountability at any point in the process because we have bad laws protecting a system instead of protecting the individual. Run 🏃🏼♀️ when you hear people say this is for the greater good! It was a lie that you were going to save granny if you got the jab.
This publication points out that the EAU injections pose a much higher risk of adverse events compared to hospitalization from covid-19...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283
TY New to your column.
Really !?! No serial numbers??? Wow!
Gaslighting on a. Global scale, so obvious that this was horrifying duplicity, even at the time