There is no doubt this is intentional. The plasmid map was provided to the FDA for the monovalent without the SV40 promoter but shows a normal T7 promoter. This was then repeated for the bivalents. For the bivalents the plasmid map provided by Pfizer has been made public by the EMA, an unusual move since this would be considered proprietary information.
I suspect the EMA knows as does the FDA. Having read the EMA regulatory documents in detail for the past 2 years, they were upset in the original submission but for the bivalents it is even more obvious imho. For instance Moderna changed the sequence for the 3" UTR without letting the EMA reviewers know, they found out about it and raised a Major Objection. It was all smoothed over but when you read the justification, you are like the EMA accepted that? Including these details which would normally be considered proprietary in their public assessment reports is a big tell for me.
All these actions by the manufacturers are what I consider hard fraud, and that, is a line I have not yet seen a manufacturer cross. They exaggerate, give embellished answers, delay, reclassify things (like the novel lipids as inactive excipients instead of adjuvants say..) but deliberately hide or make up data out of whole cloth? Nope. That is a massive fine and they know it.
So my assessment is that the regulators are just fake approving (as Sasha says), and the manufacturers are sometimes following directions from someone/somewhere else and fake manufacturing.
I agree it’s intentional. The smoothing over of these issues by FDA, EMA, and CDC is puzzling until one realizes those in charge must be enormously bribed and/or sympathetic to goals of the operation, as I suspect for Scott Gottlieb, Rochelle Walensky, and new CDC director Mandy Cohen, among many others.
I watched last year's entire ACIP in the summer time when they invited 5 year olds to the lipozomal rave and was quite shocked by the seeming ignorance. I figured there was a slight chance that they were just really lagging and that they might eventually catch up to the data. This most recent ACIP was different. Effectively speaking in code. They were all very clearly stating that things would be different from here on and that all the shots would now be bivalent and most of the discourse was around the particulars of dosing. So many mg for this group and so many mg for this other group and setting very clear and technical dosing requirements for what they refer to as the immune compromised, for children, and for elderly. Speaking in particular and technical terms about something they don't understand or in the case of immune compromise (vaccine injury) they don't even pretend that it exists!!! It's bewildering. To an analyst there would seem to be no way of interpreting the dialog other than as an encoded discussion of a plan for mass..... I mean is this unfurling behavioral health PPP apparatus just going to be for the people that notice? Thank you all for reading this. I'm grateful to be finally having this conversation.
1. the bivalents are making heterotrimers we think, that is combinations of protein monomer spikes which are not seen in nature and maybe more toxic
2. there really is no reliable relationship between mg of mRNA given and mg of spike protein produced, it is a non-linear relationship or only vaguely linear
3. they were approved on an extrapolative basis which is a lower standard than "may be effective" which is a lower standard than "are safe and effective" which was never used for the covid vaccines
Pig Harma knows it, fauXi, Baric, Daszak, Shi and many more people as well as FDA, CDC et al. DOD has been it for decades and very much engaged in an active partnership with fauXi, for research, manufacturing and the rollout. The "vaccines" were contracted as prototypes and characterized as "countermeasures" to relieve them of obligations responsibility under the various (unconstitutional)PREP and other Acts.
We have learned a great deal of the Pfizer "vaccine" product was manufactured in China, then shipped to Pfizer plant(s?) for bottling in vials. Pfizer's Oklahoma City, OK facility received China manufactured product which we learned thanks to Melissa McAtee who worked there in quality auditing for ten years. She also explained the vials "glowed" under certain lighting and released internal company emails revealing deliberate deceit by the Pfizer's management.
After all, it was the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill that weaponized the coronavirus. UNC Chapel Hill was working with the Bat Lady of Wuhan.
Definitely a YES to that, Kathleen. There was an insane amount of domestic gaslighting and coercion culminating in a presidential speech threatening any and all citizens who refused to line up to get injected against their will. My will is stronger than Biden’s.
I am still pole-axed by the tactics. And everyone I know willingly got the jab and when I was horrified they said kids all have to get shots to go to school, so what’s the big deal? Now I question those shots and they say everyone gets a flu shot every year and I’m like nope that’s a no starter for me. I have not gotten any kind of jab since 71.
Yep, Kathleen. The no jab/no job mandate was a huge red flag, but even beforehand, the constant demonization of the so-called "anti-vaxxers" was a huge red flag. It's still incredible to me that so many people failed to even question it. Their default brain mode was to simply trust that the government had their best interests in mind. Some people held out but when their job was in jeopardy, buckled under the pressure.
They're looking like they're anti-lockdown, but that might not be true. O'Shea is "former" intel. Not sure if there is a there there with Naomi via O'Shea, but CPD looks like bad news.
CHINA IS NOT OUR ENEMY. Blaming China is classic divide and conquer by the psychopaths at the top of the foodchain who are marionetteering us to a NWO.
Did you see Mikki Willis' The Great Awakening? Sophisticated anti-China propaganda. The influence of Robert Malone in Willis’ work does not bode well. Simone Gold, a sponsor of the doc's premiere, is a known Israeli asset. LOTS of dirt on her. That's another story.
Jun 4, 2023·edited Jun 4, 2023Liked by James Hill, MD
That's a very useful observation. This way, Vera Sharav makes a lot of sense. I hadn't seen it that way. Only the Mengele reference had given me pause too, because Nazi Germany was not where the idea of human eugenics originated. The idea is older. Btw, being Jewish is considered by Jews to be a genetic thing if they determine it by whether the mother is Jewish or not. Then it's inheritable. Also they are very careful with regard to conserving their gene pool, by very rigid rules for marrying only Jewish, aren't they. By which I mean to imply that they as an ethnic group are probably more acutely aware of ethnic differences and their social consequences than European Gentiles used to be until the advent of National Socialism.
How does this only have 17 likes? I feel like I can breathe for the first time in fifty years after this. I'll upgrade to paid as soon I sell my textbooks back to the committee.
'Controlled Opposition" is what is going on when a group such as one championing the environment has funding from oil companies, chemical companies and the like who are "proud to sponsor" groups "seeking solutions" and often "partner" with them. When such groups advocate reduction of say, gasoline use, the oil and gas companies are fine with that because ultimately a smaller supply drives the price of fuel up and they profit more.
By “tech bros,” I presume Naomi Wolf means officers, founders, and major shareholders of technology and media companies that promoted Covid shots and mask and vaccine mandates and that suppressed information on early treatment and adverse effects of the jabs:
Dan Schulman: PayPal
Mark Zuckerberg: Meta, Facebook, WhatsApp
Yoel Roth and Vijaya Gadde: Twitter
Adam Mosseri: Instagram
Larry Page and Sergey Brin: Google
Susan Wojcicki: YouTube
Reid Hoffman: LinkedIn
Larry Fink: BlackRock
Brian Roberts and Jeff Shell: Comcast and NBC Universal, MSNBC
Jeff Zucker: CNN
Dan Beckerman and Irving Azoff: AEG (events)
Michael Rapino and Mark Yovich: Live Nation and Ticketmaster (events)
......the THING about Naomi's Hillsdale College address in question taken away from it by ME is, I have SERIOUS doubts that she has YET made a cognitive connection to her own RHODES scholarship as being DIRECTLY related TO such conditions.....
By 'redacted' you, of course, mean Jewish people or the Israeli government. The Jews are not out to kill Europeans. By your own logic who would they steal money from if not from all those breathing white people. I've heard this stupid Jew-baiting talk all my life and I'm an old non-Jew. Seriously, it's truly ignorant speech and you need to stop.
The Black Hats are an evil Luciferian cabal, peopled by amoral psychopaths.
Some of whom may claim certain 'beliefs,' as part of their act to seem human.
Those claimed beliefs shouldn't shield them from scrutiny. If they do then you've fallen for part of the psyops.
I daresay they don't give two hoots about what happens to Israel or its citizens. They are playing a much bigger much bloodier Agenda against everyone not in the cabal.
The Israeli 'government' (ANOTHER Rockefeller-Rothschild/Bauer, British-Roman-Canaanite Empirical 'BLIND', in truth - LIKE Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran - EVEN the United States ITSELF, and SO many others) - SOME of it, absolutely IS striving to do JUST that - those identifying as Jewish, once MORE made SCAPEGOATS; stalking horses - by THEM, again.....
Re the SV40 promoter.
There is no doubt this is intentional. The plasmid map was provided to the FDA for the monovalent without the SV40 promoter but shows a normal T7 promoter. This was then repeated for the bivalents. For the bivalents the plasmid map provided by Pfizer has been made public by the EMA, an unusual move since this would be considered proprietary information.
I suspect the EMA knows as does the FDA. Having read the EMA regulatory documents in detail for the past 2 years, they were upset in the original submission but for the bivalents it is even more obvious imho. For instance Moderna changed the sequence for the 3" UTR without letting the EMA reviewers know, they found out about it and raised a Major Objection. It was all smoothed over but when you read the justification, you are like the EMA accepted that? Including these details which would normally be considered proprietary in their public assessment reports is a big tell for me.
All these actions by the manufacturers are what I consider hard fraud, and that, is a line I have not yet seen a manufacturer cross. They exaggerate, give embellished answers, delay, reclassify things (like the novel lipids as inactive excipients instead of adjuvants say..) but deliberately hide or make up data out of whole cloth? Nope. That is a massive fine and they know it.
So my assessment is that the regulators are just fake approving (as Sasha says), and the manufacturers are sometimes following directions from someone/somewhere else and fake manufacturing.
Great information. Thank you, Maria.
I agree it’s intentional. The smoothing over of these issues by FDA, EMA, and CDC is puzzling until one realizes those in charge must be enormously bribed and/or sympathetic to goals of the operation, as I suspect for Scott Gottlieb, Rochelle Walensky, and new CDC director Mandy Cohen, among many others.
This is one of the best analyses I’ve read. I agree with your assessment.
I watched last year's entire ACIP in the summer time when they invited 5 year olds to the lipozomal rave and was quite shocked by the seeming ignorance. I figured there was a slight chance that they were just really lagging and that they might eventually catch up to the data. This most recent ACIP was different. Effectively speaking in code. They were all very clearly stating that things would be different from here on and that all the shots would now be bivalent and most of the discourse was around the particulars of dosing. So many mg for this group and so many mg for this other group and setting very clear and technical dosing requirements for what they refer to as the immune compromised, for children, and for elderly. Speaking in particular and technical terms about something they don't understand or in the case of immune compromise (vaccine injury) they don't even pretend that it exists!!! It's bewildering. To an analyst there would seem to be no way of interpreting the dialog other than as an encoded discussion of a plan for mass..... I mean is this unfurling behavioral health PPP apparatus just going to be for the people that notice? Thank you all for reading this. I'm grateful to be finally having this conversation.
Yes, the bivalents are very disturbing
1. the bivalents are making heterotrimers we think, that is combinations of protein monomer spikes which are not seen in nature and maybe more toxic
2. there really is no reliable relationship between mg of mRNA given and mg of spike protein produced, it is a non-linear relationship or only vaguely linear
3. they were approved on an extrapolative basis which is a lower standard than "may be effective" which is a lower standard than "are safe and effective" which was never used for the covid vaccines
If I can make time; I will rewatch the ACIP meeting with this information.
Pig Harma knows it, fauXi, Baric, Daszak, Shi and many more people as well as FDA, CDC et al. DOD has been it for decades and very much engaged in an active partnership with fauXi, for research, manufacturing and the rollout. The "vaccines" were contracted as prototypes and characterized as "countermeasures" to relieve them of obligations responsibility under the various (unconstitutional)PREP and other Acts.
We have learned a great deal of the Pfizer "vaccine" product was manufactured in China, then shipped to Pfizer plant(s?) for bottling in vials. Pfizer's Oklahoma City, OK facility received China manufactured product which we learned thanks to Melissa McAtee who worked there in quality auditing for ten years. She also explained the vials "glowed" under certain lighting and released internal company emails revealing deliberate deceit by the Pfizer's management.
Not sure I would blame China entirely.
After all, it was the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill that weaponized the coronavirus. UNC Chapel Hill was working with the Bat Lady of Wuhan.
But the blame, at least 95%, should be on the US.
Definitely a YES to that, Kathleen. There was an insane amount of domestic gaslighting and coercion culminating in a presidential speech threatening any and all citizens who refused to line up to get injected against their will. My will is stronger than Biden’s.
What should have tipped everyone off was the "forcing" function that was employed to get people to take the death shot.
Threats. No jab. No job. No travel. No medical care.
Never saw such totalitarian tactics in my life.
I am still pole-axed by the tactics. And everyone I know willingly got the jab and when I was horrified they said kids all have to get shots to go to school, so what’s the big deal? Now I question those shots and they say everyone gets a flu shot every year and I’m like nope that’s a no starter for me. I have not gotten any kind of jab since 71.
Yep, Kathleen. The no jab/no job mandate was a huge red flag, but even beforehand, the constant demonization of the so-called "anti-vaxxers" was a huge red flag. It's still incredible to me that so many people failed to even question it. Their default brain mode was to simply trust that the government had their best interests in mind. Some people held out but when their job was in jeopardy, buckled under the pressure.
I used to think the anti-vaxxers may have been wrong.
Now...I am an anti-vaxxer.
LOL
......NOT Canada? Parker & Stone didn't know HOW right they WERE with that 'song' (inasmuch as what Eric Cartman does, CAN be CALLED singing.....)
Are you familiar with the Brian O'Shea's work? He is Naomi Wolf's husband. He works with Frank Gaffney on Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force
https://stopvaxpassports.org/petition-stop-vax-passports/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujOfqWDz1xk
Frank Gaffney, along with Steve Bannon, is with the Committee on the Present Danger: China (CPD)
https://presentdangerchina.org/members/
They're looking like they're anti-lockdown, but that might not be true. O'Shea is "former" intel. Not sure if there is a there there with Naomi via O'Shea, but CPD looks like bad news.
CHINA IS NOT OUR ENEMY. Blaming China is classic divide and conquer by the psychopaths at the top of the foodchain who are marionetteering us to a NWO.
Did you see Mikki Willis' The Great Awakening? Sophisticated anti-China propaganda. The influence of Robert Malone in Willis’ work does not bode well. Simone Gold, a sponsor of the doc's premiere, is a known Israeli asset. LOTS of dirt on her. That's another story.
Hi EW,
Very interesting. Will check out these sources.
Thank you.
That's a very useful observation. This way, Vera Sharav makes a lot of sense. I hadn't seen it that way. Only the Mengele reference had given me pause too, because Nazi Germany was not where the idea of human eugenics originated. The idea is older. Btw, being Jewish is considered by Jews to be a genetic thing if they determine it by whether the mother is Jewish or not. Then it's inheritable. Also they are very careful with regard to conserving their gene pool, by very rigid rules for marrying only Jewish, aren't they. By which I mean to imply that they as an ethnic group are probably more acutely aware of ethnic differences and their social consequences than European Gentiles used to be until the advent of National Socialism.
not really... many marry whomever they please and have done so for thousands of years. It's a religion, not an ethnic group.
I know many marry as they please, But it's a bit of both I think.
Indiana Universtity taught years ago that Jews were in a unique category of being both a religion and ethnicity.
question everything
How does this only have 17 likes? I feel like I can breathe for the first time in fifty years after this. I'll upgrade to paid as soon I sell my textbooks back to the committee.
Welcome, Travis!
Thank you for your observations and encouraging words.
Rhodes Scholar.
'Controlled Opposition" is what is going on when a group such as one championing the environment has funding from oil companies, chemical companies and the like who are "proud to sponsor" groups "seeking solutions" and often "partner" with them. When such groups advocate reduction of say, gasoline use, the oil and gas companies are fine with that because ultimately a smaller supply drives the price of fuel up and they profit more.
So redacted by you or by Substack?
By me.
You're getting tailor made headlines from the psyop press now? Or "unrelated attempts to turf on language"
https://www.youtube.com/live/5Litlwy08GY?feature=share
Who are the tech bros?
By “tech bros,” I presume Naomi Wolf means officers, founders, and major shareholders of technology and media companies that promoted Covid shots and mask and vaccine mandates and that suppressed information on early treatment and adverse effects of the jabs:
Dan Schulman: PayPal
Mark Zuckerberg: Meta, Facebook, WhatsApp
Yoel Roth and Vijaya Gadde: Twitter
Adam Mosseri: Instagram
Larry Page and Sergey Brin: Google
Susan Wojcicki: YouTube
Reid Hoffman: LinkedIn
Larry Fink: BlackRock
Brian Roberts and Jeff Shell: Comcast and NBC Universal, MSNBC
Jeff Zucker: CNN
Dan Beckerman and Irving Azoff: AEG (events)
Michael Rapino and Mark Yovich: Live Nation and Ticketmaster (events)
(many more)
......the THING about Naomi's Hillsdale College address in question taken away from it by ME is, I have SERIOUS doubts that she has YET made a cognitive connection to her own RHODES scholarship as being DIRECTLY related TO such conditions.....
is it KM??
Hi Victoria,
I don’t know what KM is.
kazarian mafia
what's the redacted bullshit?
By 'redacted' you, of course, mean Jewish people or the Israeli government. The Jews are not out to kill Europeans. By your own logic who would they steal money from if not from all those breathing white people. I've heard this stupid Jew-baiting talk all my life and I'm an old non-Jew. Seriously, it's truly ignorant speech and you need to stop.
Certainly not all people of any ethnicity, religion, country, or organization. That’s not what’s meant.
The Black Hats are an evil Luciferian cabal, peopled by amoral psychopaths.
Some of whom may claim certain 'beliefs,' as part of their act to seem human.
Those claimed beliefs shouldn't shield them from scrutiny. If they do then you've fallen for part of the psyops.
I daresay they don't give two hoots about what happens to Israel or its citizens. They are playing a much bigger much bloodier Agenda against everyone not in the cabal.
Peace.
Maybe 'redacted' is the Khazarian mafia ...
I think it is more comprehensive as is.
The Israeli 'government' (ANOTHER Rockefeller-Rothschild/Bauer, British-Roman-Canaanite Empirical 'BLIND', in truth - LIKE Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran - EVEN the United States ITSELF, and SO many others) - SOME of it, absolutely IS striving to do JUST that - those identifying as Jewish, once MORE made SCAPEGOATS; stalking horses - by THEM, again.....
"naomi" and her FAKE, BREATHY VOICE are the tactics of a SERPENT...
I unsubscribed from WOLFs media last week...so many SERPENTS invaded the real truth movement