I believe that Ole Dammegard may be very high-level controlled opposition (CO). We need to always keep in mind that CO occupies every level of "truth", it's always in there trying to mislead.
In my post, Are false flags a thing? I make the case that there is no such thing as a false flag per se that there are only psyops and that unless they want to kill people as with the jab they don't kill them because psyops are all about mind control, not doing things for real unless wanted.
1. There is ZERO necessity to kill people for real in order to have the majority believe that they were killed (exemplar extraordinaire, Sandy Hook, where they just give us a few drops of red stuff to indicate a massacre of 26 people and loads of other nonsense)
2. Psyops are about maximising dupery not minimising it so why would they kill people for real when they only want you to BELIEVE in their deaths?
3. Killing people for real is often impracticable to the point of impossible in the context. 9/11 was a demolition job and what happens in demolition jobs before they bring the buildings down? They FULLY evacuate them, they don't partly evacuate them. We are told that :
--- Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) presented a cleanup plan for the WTC 11 days after the fateful day. "Cleanup" plan is a misleading term. All the WTC buildings were either completely destroyed or badly "damaged" on the day and the ones that were damaged no doubt needed to be destroyed completely by using explosives - they surely weren't able to simply knock them down using mechanical methods. Of course, we see none of how they "cleaned up" the partly-destroyed buildings at the WTC.
--- CDI has four world records in large building "projects", three of which were achieved in the three years prior to 9/11.
--- CDI is very proud of its safety record.
Safe inference: CDI had a lot to do with the destruction of the WTC buildings and they wouldn't have agreed to leave people in buildings for a terror story.
4. They run psyops ongoingly. They need to reassure all the crisis actors they employ that they won't get killed which they obviously cannot do if they really do kill people.
I cannot say no one was killed or injured because it was such a huge operation but what I can say with no fear of contradiction is:
--- there is ZERO convincing evidence of anyone being killed or injured
--- the 118 firefighter deliberately named "oral" histories - nothing oral about them - betray nonesnsicality to the point of obvious fakery
--- there is ZERO reference in any of the 118 firefighter testimonies to any of the alleged 343 firefighter deaths ... which makes no sense if firefighters were really killed right?
My cousin was a firefighter at the time of 9/11. He got transferred from Hell’s Kitchen in Manhattan to another borough just before it happened. He lost all his former mates from that Hell’s Kitchen firehouse. Either it’s true, or my cousin is a liar. It has never entered my mind that my cousin would lie about anything, let alone something this big. He was there running away from building 7 as it was coming down. And yet, when I finally asked him about it for the first time - just last year - he gave me the official narrative (even though his wife was next to him agreeing with me). I do think my cousin is basically an honest man, but I do think he’d fudge with me, if his pension depended on it. I hate to say that, but I am sure those guys had some pretty serious things said to them.
100% TRUTH. Ive been onto this investigating myself, via volunteering, since L. I. @Sandy Storm devastation following twin towers, building seven, the pentagon, billions unaccounted for…?
The Red Cross, RED shoes/soles of shoes.
Such Fakery in plain sight. FEMA is also the devil on steroids. But my education truly began right after high school. I took a summer intern job at the dept. of SOCIAL “SERVICES.” I was driving an adolescent boy to the dentist. He fid everything in his power to fully expose himself to me enroute. Although I knew precisely shat he was doing, i kept my composure, focused ahead as if i were wearing horse blinders.
Once we had arrived unscathed, the dentist kept making comments about how lucky this lad was (to him) to have had such a pretty escort. Can you believe it???!
I endured the very same targeting on the return trip and handled it in the very same fashion, praying that Id live to tell the story. Quite professional for a seventeen year old girl, summer of ‘69, Id say.
I guess these days , the entire governments are false flags
I believe that Ole Dammegard may be very high-level controlled opposition (CO). We need to always keep in mind that CO occupies every level of "truth", it's always in there trying to mislead.
In my post, Are false flags a thing? I make the case that there is no such thing as a false flag per se that there are only psyops and that unless they want to kill people as with the jab they don't kill them because psyops are all about mind control, not doing things for real unless wanted.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/are-false-flags-a-thing
1. There is ZERO necessity to kill people for real in order to have the majority believe that they were killed (exemplar extraordinaire, Sandy Hook, where they just give us a few drops of red stuff to indicate a massacre of 26 people and loads of other nonsense)
2. Psyops are about maximising dupery not minimising it so why would they kill people for real when they only want you to BELIEVE in their deaths?
3. Killing people for real is often impracticable to the point of impossible in the context. 9/11 was a demolition job and what happens in demolition jobs before they bring the buildings down? They FULLY evacuate them, they don't partly evacuate them. We are told that :
--- Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) presented a cleanup plan for the WTC 11 days after the fateful day. "Cleanup" plan is a misleading term. All the WTC buildings were either completely destroyed or badly "damaged" on the day and the ones that were damaged no doubt needed to be destroyed completely by using explosives - they surely weren't able to simply knock them down using mechanical methods. Of course, we see none of how they "cleaned up" the partly-destroyed buildings at the WTC.
--- CDI has four world records in large building "projects", three of which were achieved in the three years prior to 9/11.
--- CDI is very proud of its safety record.
Safe inference: CDI had a lot to do with the destruction of the WTC buildings and they wouldn't have agreed to leave people in buildings for a terror story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Demolition,_Inc.
https://www.controlled-demolition.com/world-records/
https://www.controlled-demolition.com/about-us-explosives-controlled-demolition-implosion/safety/
4. They run psyops ongoingly. They need to reassure all the crisis actors they employ that they won't get killed which they obviously cannot do if they really do kill people.
Uh, news flash; most of substack is controlled opposition.
I can accept that they could pull off a full evacuation, but do you believe no firefighters were killed?
I cannot say no one was killed or injured because it was such a huge operation but what I can say with no fear of contradiction is:
--- there is ZERO convincing evidence of anyone being killed or injured
--- the 118 firefighter deliberately named "oral" histories - nothing oral about them - betray nonesnsicality to the point of obvious fakery
--- there is ZERO reference in any of the 118 firefighter testimonies to any of the alleged 343 firefighter deaths ... which makes no sense if firefighters were really killed right?
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/nonsensicalities-in-the-911-firefighter
My cousin was a firefighter at the time of 9/11. He got transferred from Hell’s Kitchen in Manhattan to another borough just before it happened. He lost all his former mates from that Hell’s Kitchen firehouse. Either it’s true, or my cousin is a liar. It has never entered my mind that my cousin would lie about anything, let alone something this big. He was there running away from building 7 as it was coming down. And yet, when I finally asked him about it for the first time - just last year - he gave me the official narrative (even though his wife was next to him agreeing with me). I do think my cousin is basically an honest man, but I do think he’d fudge with me, if his pension depended on it. I hate to say that, but I am sure those guys had some pretty serious things said to them.
On point. Any links available to the clips in the article? Especially the second one featuring "Christine" talking about her gay son and ARs?
Thank you.
Ole video (also linked in the second paragraph above):
https://lightonconspiracies.com/the-importance-of-understanding-exposing-and-stopping-false-flags/
Christine video:
https://youtu.be/uiBxr94XINg
100% TRUTH. Ive been onto this investigating myself, via volunteering, since L. I. @Sandy Storm devastation following twin towers, building seven, the pentagon, billions unaccounted for…?
The Red Cross, RED shoes/soles of shoes.
Such Fakery in plain sight. FEMA is also the devil on steroids. But my education truly began right after high school. I took a summer intern job at the dept. of SOCIAL “SERVICES.” I was driving an adolescent boy to the dentist. He fid everything in his power to fully expose himself to me enroute. Although I knew precisely shat he was doing, i kept my composure, focused ahead as if i were wearing horse blinders.
Once we had arrived unscathed, the dentist kept making comments about how lucky this lad was (to him) to have had such a pretty escort. Can you believe it???!
I endured the very same targeting on the return trip and handled it in the very same fashion, praying that Id live to tell the story. Quite professional for a seventeen year old girl, summer of ‘69, Id say.
Brilliant Delingpole episode.
Yes
Yup. No doubt about it
Great Exposure of these Psychotic/Predator/Parasites.