Authorized vaccine makers won’t say why their jabs don’t utilize the virus’s immunogenic, mutationally stable, and apparently nontoxic M protein (Updated 7/18/22)
wow! thanks for the first part, but no thank you, I am not interested in their jabs. Why? Because they only push them to kill us, not to help us. So, I do not trust them to put the stuff in the jabs they will tell they are putting there. Maybe in the study phase it will be a really great jab, but at the mass jabbing phase, they will put god-knows-what in there and will kill us anyway. I pass.
My long-held belief is because they want it to be the "SARS-CoV-2" S spike and nothing else, preferably coded by mRNA wrapped in LNP. It works as they want it to work, and they won't have it any other way.
S protein is immunogenic and responsible for viral binding to the cell membrane and subsequent viral entry into the cell. So it is a good starting target antigen for a vaccine.
But they should have removed dangerous epitopes from the S protein and used additional antigens, perhaps including M, to reduce immune escape and perhaps infectivity (would need to confirm this through testing).
Also would not use lipid nanoparticles carrying mRNA expressing spike protein at uncontrolled, variable doses and distributed in brain, adrenals, ovaries, testes, liver, etc.
Imagine they would create a vaccine that gives people all viral targets (structural and nonstructural) orally and not intramuscularly. This might just work 😆 for now:
To claim that vaccines could ever be more effective than natural infection is illogic and insane —> it's not possible to create better or the same immunity as through infections and have it less harmful as infections
Considering mutations, especially in Coronaviruses, vaccination can’t work. That’s why there have never been any vaccines for coronavirus before SARS-CoV-2.
Looks like M would have been a good choice for a real vaccine. The only way I see currently to get M exposure and immunity is to get Sars-2. Omicron variants B4,5,.... are as close to a real vaccine that we are likely to see. But Pfizer makes no bucks, so they flog a mRNA experimental "therapeutic" targeting the original WuHan strain, which has been extinct for several years.
https://youtu.be/R000hqe2fIw
wow! thanks for the first part, but no thank you, I am not interested in their jabs. Why? Because they only push them to kill us, not to help us. So, I do not trust them to put the stuff in the jabs they will tell they are putting there. Maybe in the study phase it will be a really great jab, but at the mass jabbing phase, they will put god-knows-what in there and will kill us anyway. I pass.
My long-held belief is because they want it to be the "SARS-CoV-2" S spike and nothing else, preferably coded by mRNA wrapped in LNP. It works as they want it to work, and they won't have it any other way.
bioweapon was the objective.
Bioweapon is the means, depopulation is the objective. Telling you as a cat to cat.
💕you’re right, meow💕
https://youtu.be/9EayvrXlaPs?t=2800
this is all fine and well but when all iis aid and done it may be that corona viruses are not that amenable to vaccination programs
So why do you think all companies went after the S protein?
What do you think is behind this distinct lack of M interest? and
what part do you think China/Barik connection played?
Dr. Yeadon has answered that question already
S protein is immunogenic and responsible for viral binding to the cell membrane and subsequent viral entry into the cell. So it is a good starting target antigen for a vaccine.
But they should have removed dangerous epitopes from the S protein and used additional antigens, perhaps including M, to reduce immune escape and perhaps infectivity (would need to confirm this through testing).
Also would not use lipid nanoparticles carrying mRNA expressing spike protein at uncontrolled, variable doses and distributed in brain, adrenals, ovaries, testes, liver, etc.
Imagine they would create a vaccine that gives people all viral targets (structural and nonstructural) orally and not intramuscularly. This might just work 😆 for now:
To claim that vaccines could ever be more effective than natural infection is illogic and insane —> it's not possible to create better or the same immunity as through infections and have it less harmful as infections
<- ZERO chance !!!
Considering mutations, especially in Coronaviruses, vaccination can’t work. That’s why there have never been any vaccines for coronavirus before SARS-CoV-2.
James --> Robert’s work on the Indian vaccine (M protein, Robert wanted to include a part of the RBD)
Looks like M would have been a good choice for a real vaccine. The only way I see currently to get M exposure and immunity is to get Sars-2. Omicron variants B4,5,.... are as close to a real vaccine that we are likely to see. But Pfizer makes no bucks, so they flog a mRNA experimental "therapeutic" targeting the original WuHan strain, which has been extinct for several years.
And functionally constrained
It was intentional, nefarious intent