1) I have seen that photo a dozen times and I’m shocked (not) that I can no longer find it on DuckDuckGo.
2) Wolf is also a compelling speaker and writer, and uses it to her advantage (similar to Malone). His appeal is to one audience and hers a different audience. Now she is reading The Geneva Bible to her listeners. Between the two of them, they are coraling a large segment.
3) Kennedy the same
All 3 preach some truths. It’s necessay, like releasing the steam valve on a pressure cooker. As Blaise says, trust but verify...yet as the ability to verify is quietly altered or erased, it will become even more difficult.
I remember shortly before his death, Zalenko looked straight into the camera, talking about the noahide laws. I know they are trying to tell us something, but I’m just not getting it. I don’t understand.
Excellent article, particularly on Overton window info by Chomsky.
What I take from Malone is that, yes, maybe he is controlled opposition. But here's the thing: to get to that point, he must relate some true information, just like any double agent. So, I take what I can, but them am critical enough to parse the rest for what, as you note here, may be disinformation. Trust but verify in sum...
Like Naomi Wolf and Dr. McCullough, Malone has a wealth of valuable insights, and one can’t help but be appreciative for this. We just need to be aware of the limits, I suppose.
May 30, 2023·edited May 30, 2023Liked by James Hill, MD
So, more indications that Bob Malone is being enabled as controlled opposition to define the scope of debate and hide that our own DOD planned, funded and owned this "Covid" binary bioweapons system ethnically targeting Americans and Europeans.
It won't come as a suprise to you that during my 15 years in Australian Public Service I have not met one SES Officer nor APS staff who were familiar with Framing the debate as Noam Chomsky wrote in The Common Good (1998). Also, while researching the political landscape in Canberra, I attended approximately 30 Labour/Liberal meetings. Zero engagement when I mentioned Chomsky. Agree with you reg. Malone. Thank you for your substack.
I’m suspicious of Chomsky in the Covid operation, where he said the unjabbed might need to starve, and in 9/11, when he said he didn’t matter if the buildings were demolished.
It turns out Chomsky was a close associate of Epstein, so there may be an explanatory connection there.
However, his work in linguistics and other matters has been brilliant and illuminating.
[clip] "In December 1995, The New York Times reported that Noam Chomsky approved of the appointment of his fellow MIT academic, John Deutch, as head of the CIA. (Until then Deutch had been No.2 at the Pentagon.) According to the report, Chomsky said, ' [Deutch] has more honesty and integrity than anyone I've ever met in academic life, or any anyone I've ever met in academic life, or any other life. If somebody's got to be running the CIA, I'm glad it's him.' etc.
And this surprising revelation too > Foreign Policy - Feb 27, 2013 - The CIA has nothing on Noam Chomsky (no, really)
> Guess he wasn't ever the bad kind of Jan 6th radical rights "protestor" huh??
[clip] "The CIA has nothing on Noam Chomsky (no, really) This month, a two-year-long investigation into CIA records on Noam Chomsky concluded with a surprising result: Despite a half-century of brazen anti-war activism and countless overseas speaking engagements, the Central Intelligence Agency has no file on the legendary MIT professor. "Our searches were thorough and diligent, and it is highly unlikely that repeating those searches ......"
p.s. Can't find the rest of the this ^article tho when I click on the embedded link..
Yep, Clear that Chomsky is controlled opposition & "no CIA files" means they never collected or else destroyed his files in order to hide any CIA complicity.
Maybe, like so many, he too was not actually warning against what they described. Maybe he was not warning against restricting the Overton window, but was instead teaching how to do it properly.
Absolutely agree on Chomsky. My comment did not endorse ALL Chomsky work. It was given in the context of sharing my frustration about the lack of depth of thinking during political meetings in Canberra. Even during the book launch "The political economy of inequality" written by political economist Frank Stilwell, our Liberal Party leaders were more interested in small chat than having ANY debate with the author or the audience.
Thanks for this breakdown. Not sure if it is the first article of yours that I have read. Subscribed to so many stacks, and time is always short.
The tactics really are quite transparent - doesn't help that they are using the radical playbook from over a century ago. Authoritarians, not the most innovative people in the world. And given the scale of this democide of course there will be extreme layers of protection for the Black Hats. Controlling the opposition is play #1 from their playbook.
This is a one-shot gambit, played for all the chips on the planet. If and when they fail to kill us all they will swing.
I recall that early ethnic distinction someone discovered. Like GP120/HIV inserts, it seemed to slide down a memory hole very quickly.
As with 9/11, the fingerprints are pretty distinctive.
It does seem to be a one-shot gambit, which is scary because it means they’re likely convinced they won’t get caught, perhaps due to severe damage they expect to victims or the system.
May 31, 2023·edited May 31, 2023Liked by James Hill, MD
My take is that the serious unexpected blunder was the release of the docs that had been planned to not be available. That and only that removes plausibility in denial which would have been so important. Because without us knowing that there were harm signals from the start, we could have been made to believe that all harm was from the "illness" not from the "prophylaxis against the illness". Still, despite that FOIA release happening, they were forced to continue with their playbook as it had been written and rehearsed in Event 201. Because any deviation would have risked creating chaos in the global choreography, as too many lower level actors in governments and local health regulations agencies etc might have felt entitled to switch over to individual critical thinking mode, with disastrous consequences. So, despite damning evidence from their own trials, and therefore totally un-understandably in an _innocent_ frame, everything - including injecting pregnant women
- had to go on - in stark contrast to what those trials had taught. This was the one thing that made people become suspicious. Yet they had to carry on. Because the all chips gamble was not the pandemic, this is what I posit. I posit that the pandemic was supposed to roll on unremarkably, and the real all chips gamble is the WHO labeled global power grab, which was needed to be seen flowing organically, logically, automatically from the commonly experienced pandemic event. They had counted on 2 things that did not materialize as planned: 1) No aforeknowledge documented by FOIA enforced study release, 2) No visibly sudden deaths (therefore the possible Damar Hamlin death cancellation op? Because no one course-altering event was to be allowed). Oh, and one other very important aspect: No autopsies as per WHO guidance! Yet some were performed early on, which was the main if not only reason we learned early on about the "micro clotting in entire endothelium" issue. That was when blood thinners were added to private protocols. Oh, and also remarkable: At least in Germany, pharma lobbyist with no hope for continuation of his lineage to the future (he keeps a dog with his husband instead of having children with a wife) and then health minister Spahn, had unsuccessfully tried to introduce mandatory (opt-out) organ donation. His successor, pharma lobbyist and health minister Lauterbach, is trying to revive this opt-out organ donation law. Imagine the wealth of organs to dissect, eg to study remdesivir results, and lnp distribution, and spike distribution... And to sell the better looking ones for transplanting? (Merely joking here, isn't it hilarious). In any case I think they needed safe non-aforeknowledge, invisibility of sudden deaths, absence of clarity on mechanisms of harm. To make the pandemic treaty a natural-looking consequence of our common experience. Since the three important prerequisites were NOT met, we became aware, as in our hypnosis or anesthesia was broken - and yet, they have to go through the motions anyway, but now under totally reality-adverse pretentions which no-one buys any more yet no-one has the power to stop it. And that gives the entire affair its spooky, creepy feel.
Brilliant. I think you’re right about their not expecting the Pfizer trial document release, large numbers of visible sudden deaths (although it’s hard to imagine athletes dying on the field wouldn’t be caught on camera), and autopsies showing jabs as the cause of death.
Remarkably, people still have faith in leaders pushing the shots despite these revelations.
I have just reconsidered the bit about them not expecting visible drop-dead cases. I just recall all the video footage from China showing just that. In a way we had actually been primed for expecting this phenomenon. Expecting it from the "illness". Interesting to think about what actors and factions are behind such videos being made seen in the west on western social media. "The" Chinese is insufficient. I am not sure what steered such Chinese social media accounts as published those pictures to the West. It needn't even have been related to Chinese government. (See Matthew Ehret work on China and Western influence in China, Taiwan for differentiation in that regard.) So the drop dead phenomenon could have become a most impressive part of the narrative, specially given that they had made a point about asymptomatic COVID. All the dying would just be declared to have had asymptomatic COVID at some point. Easy in absence of Pfizer study data showing the harms already known and being related to the injections. Yes, I think without the FOIA reveals, the narrative would have been, look at all the players/pilots dying, isn't Covid dangerous! See now how right we were to vaccinate against it? So many deaths, infertility, stillbirths, despite our wonderful vaccines - just imagine the death count from (long) COVID if we hadn't had those! It would have been so much higher! - They are trying this narrative, just that it isn't convincing, rather preposterous under the circumstances. In absence of FOIA data we might have bought it though. So, no aforeknowledge - much harm - all from COVID - the mRNA platform saves us twice: first through the vaccines, second through mRNA cancer treatments against the turbo cancers caused by long COVID. All of that would have sounded plausible. Btw, if they succeed, soon there will be all encompassing censoring by the power grabbers. In such circumstances, the same thing might work out again. Only that their credibility is down now. El Gato Malo yesterday had a great stack about that, about them losing out in the coming trust economy (or similar). Another thing we especially our scientists need to think about NOW: establish a code for communicating between the lines in studies. For marking politically correct bullshit, which however has to be written into the studies to get them 'peer' approved, so, to mark the bullshit as mere rhetoric so we don't accidentally take it for real (as we might do in non obvious cases); and code for how to place bits of important data and information in the studies surreptitiously so that they get published with this data and can then be deciphered for useful content. This has to happen within the next three months or it comes later than their censoring simulation exercise of which you will have heard.
> Yet, if an NIH whistleblower physician with firsthand knowledge is correct, Covid injections are part of a biowarfare attack by [redacted] military intelligence principally against Europeans and Americans, and Dr. Malone’s primary message themes appear to be controlled opposition, reinforcing limits of acceptable discussion and leading you away from the perpetrators and their intentions.
To me those who represent controlled opposition are somewhat easy to spot. They avoid naming the real actual threats, harangue away about some connected with the real threats, pretend to be patriots and human rights advocates but completely and skillfully ignore the place where all of these are joined at the hips. Whatever your favorite centralized world government is - it does exist and is more than likely linked at the level of WEF at Davos, Bilderberg, or another one of these. Often like Mr. M they ride white horses, have an apocalyptic and patronizing tone. Beware of limited hangouts!
Malone gets so much airtime and most of what he says seems to be said to try to impress about how plugged in he is, he's in the know, he's equal to the big guys and knows alot blah-blah and blah.
And then, too, he points out that the Masses, the Little People, are PSYCHOTIC with Mass Formation. But does he REALLY say anything that is going to help? Has he EVER said anything that would help? Any antidote to "his invention" of the biotech weapon he's ever bothered to share? At the least, he is a dangerous old windbag, taking up space but bringing nothing of substance to the table. (His "credentials" -- years of bioweaponry contracts -- are not the substance we need!) At the most he is a dangerous frontline mole inserted by the Deep State and Globalists to undermine every real frontline activist.
I appreciate the coverage here, because it is obvious we are still in big trouble.
o We are still in the crosshairs with the W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty (that word 'treaty' is used as war language, and they are expecting us to SURRENDER our sovereignty -- both our bodily sovereignty and our national sovereignty!).
o Bill Gates is still smirking and drooling, gearing up for His Next Pandemic!
o Klaus Schwab is still lurking and planning to TATTOO us all with nanotech Q DOTS identification -- just like his daddy did when he ran the slave labor factory for the Nazis where every slave laborer and prisoner was TATTOOED on the arm/wrist with an I.D. number.
These monsters haven't even stopped to take a ski vacation, folks. When they are not counting the money they stole from us the past three plus years, they are busy planning the next step to attain their New One World Order where those of us who remain after their pandemic killing sprees are all their TATTOOED SLAVES.
Can you imagine that with his knowledge, with his credentials, he would have taken Moderna injection on the basis of rumors that this one would treat a long Covid?
I replied to a comment yesterday:
He didn't take it. He KNOWS what the ingredients are. He consulted on hydroxychloroquine research in the fall of 2020. He knew how to "treat long Covid." As an "insider" he knew about ADE (but said he was waiting to see if there would be ADE, but there were "rumors" that it helps treat long Covid, which he had). https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download - page 16 of the following document, from October 22, 2020 - -Vaccine enhanced disease - IT WAS KNOWN
He knows all the "adjuvants" and technologies. Never speaks about them. I know and I speak but he knows so much more.
I don’t trust that any “leader” we’ve seen supposedly getting jabbed really got anything like they coerce the rest of us to take.
Why would they show us photos and videos of these people getting the shots? It’s juvenile for anyone to think, “Oh, there’s Biden getting the vaccine, so it must be trustworthy. I’ll run out now and get it!”
Yet, that’s how many people do think, and that’s why theater is presented.
One of Sasha Latypova’s most important findings is different vials potentially contain different ingredients, as GMP standards are not followed. Some vials reportedly have no DNA or mRNA, some have heavy metals, etc.
May 31, 2023·edited May 31, 2023Liked by James Hill, MD
The Russian roulette only because they just couldn't make it more consistent while at the same time rapidly vaccinating 8bln humans many a time on short notice. Next time it will work more consistently while less conspicuously, achieving better results at the desired time horizon. And with more plausible deniability. But, they achieved a lot in a rather elegant manner even on the first try. I mean, none of them is about to pay for what they've done any time soon.
Jun 1, 2023·edited Jun 1, 2023Liked by James Hill, MD
Yes, could be, it's hard to know. Seems like they went too hard initially and then dialed it back somewhat, but that compromised the "efficacy", thus now requiring more rounds. Some initial small batches seemed to have been the most deadly, and that was the process of them discovering the "golden ratio"? But with the mRNA technology alone, there are so many promising ways to do many "good" things all at once. The sky is the limit.
> Different batches had different overall total adverse effects & some batches were far more deadly than others by the numbers. So that goes to deliberate toxicity manipulation & separating out groups of individuals from others by different degrees of so-called vaxx dangers & toxicity. Not the same products.
> NO DENIABILITY < (as if there was ANY deadly product deniability by any manufacturer before this analysis of the overall "C19 vaxx" batch #'s anyway)
[excerpt] "This vaccine comes with significant adverse event risks as reported on the WHO's own database - Vigiaccess.org, where 311,843 adverse eventsare recorded so far including Facial Paralysis, Heart Inflammation, Pericarditis, Brain Damage, Meningitis, Encephalitis, and Guillain-Barre. ...
> How Bad is My Batch . Batch codes and associated deaths, disabilities and illnesses for Covid 19 Vaccines .
(See the data listed for each manufacturers' vaxx/batches at the link...)
However, one of my colleagues wanted data just on young people of an athletic age (18-35), so I filtered for that age range. On doing so I obtained 887 reports that provided an onset interval. Of these 887 reports, 700 reports had onset within 24 hours - thats 79% of the reports. 806 had onset within 48 hours - thats 90% !
WARNING : NASAL FLU VACCINE UK. As of 1st September 2023 all secondary school students in the UK will be offered Fluenz, a nasal spray vaccine for influenza.This vaccine comes with significant adverse event risks as reported on the WHO's own database ...
Is there even a spike protein? This came up in the comments on this article. And I quote,
"The purported mRNA would be biological if it does exist because they use bacteria to produce them, and that's a biological process.
I still can't decide whether there's mRNA in the shots or not. Too much conflicting info. But if there is, it's definitely not a 'spike' protein because that's just a stupid proposition. A 'spike' protein (which doesn't exist, it's just suggestive, scary imagery for an infantile culture) is, in theory, just an infinitesimally tiny glycoprotein that would have zero function when unattached to a 'virus' (exosome), and is so small even WBCs would look at it like a leftover crumb on their plates.
Because most of the injuries have fibrotic disease in common, the most likely mRNAs that they are culturing and putting in the LNPs are tumor exosomes. That's assuming there are mRNAs. Jury's still out imo. If so, the decades and billions spent on cancer research are paying off.
Fibrotic disease -- excess fibrin production by fibroblasts -- destroys tissues. Myocarditis, for example, is caused by excess production of fibrin by the fibroblasts in the heart wall.
One of the two major classes of tumor exosomes signal to fibroblasts for fibrin production because that's what tumors are made of.
The other main class of tumor exosomes signal for igg3 suppression and igg4 upregulation so that the 'immune' system doesn't thwart the tumor formation that the intelligent body has called for in order to sequester fat-soluble toxins that the body is unable to deposit in adipose tissue; it's supposed to be a temporary overflow/redundancy function. Cancer happens when it becomes a permanent necessity".
Proposal: stop the bioweapon shots, confiscate the supply, analyze the contents forensically, destroy the remainder. Who could reasonably argue with that? (Initiative of Dr. Joseph Sansone of Florida using county Republican committees to accomplish it--4 counties have passed the resolution thus far). It should serve as a template for action everywhere. As far as I know, not one US politician has actively joined by sponsoring such a bill at the state or federal level. What does that say?
So do I. He came to speak in Santa Barbara early on. I know a lot of people who were involved in that effort. I have trusted them and their judgment from the outset. They all believe him to be a fine human. I’m good with that. I read every email he has ever sent and I’ve yet to see a chink in his armor. He’s just not quite as far along.
He's not stupid. He also pushes the lies of "virology" which is always a red flag for me. And he's been in bio-weapon development for most of his career, so there is another...
My assessment is that you are correct. I think the problem is that most people are busy, they have jobs, families, etc., and they haven't invested sufficient time in listening to people like Dr. Malone to really understand "where they are coming from". I have a background in nursing, which gave me a major advantage in understanding journal articles about SARS-CoV-2/COVID and understanding researchers and doctors discussing the virus and its effects and treatment protocols. I'm retired, and have been closely following the "pandemic" since it first really hit the news in January 2020. For months I spent probably 8 hours per day or more studying the beast— partly for my own protection since I am in a high-risk cohort. So by the time I caught it (summer 2020), I had my serum vitamin D very high, had Ivermectin, vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, my oxygen sensor, etc. all ready. Got through it just fine except for a residual fatigue/mitochondrial dysfunction effect. At the time I hadn't heard anything about spikes and mitochondrial toxicity, so it took me a while to self-diagnose by a process of elimination. ("It's the ATP, stupid"!)
So in the course of my studies, I watched hours and hours of videos of all our "COVID heros": Dr. McCullough, Bartlett, Kory, Marik, Nass, Merrit, Cole, etc., and yes, Dr. Malone. I think I have a pretty good grasp of what he has been saying from the beginning of his "coming on the scene". And I don't think his critics have/are really listening to him, or else they are not understanding him. He is a scientist as well as an M.D. He doesn't like to make unfounded speculation, so he is cautious in the way he states things. Non-scientists may not understand that.
He often reveals his "inside the system" perspective. The "good people at the FDA". I imagine he can't face the truth about how thoroughly corrupted by evil the institutions he "worked" have become.
1) I have seen that photo a dozen times and I’m shocked (not) that I can no longer find it on DuckDuckGo.
2) Wolf is also a compelling speaker and writer, and uses it to her advantage (similar to Malone). His appeal is to one audience and hers a different audience. Now she is reading The Geneva Bible to her listeners. Between the two of them, they are coraling a large segment.
3) Kennedy the same
All 3 preach some truths. It’s necessay, like releasing the steam valve on a pressure cooker. As Blaise says, trust but verify...yet as the ability to verify is quietly altered or erased, it will become even more difficult.
Thank you, gigiRN.
Wolf is pushing Noahide laws, which don’t seem as wonderful as they’re being pitched:
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/naomi-wolf-reveals-vaccine-genocide
I remember shortly before his death, Zalenko looked straight into the camera, talking about the noahide laws. I know they are trying to tell us something, but I’m just not getting it. I don’t understand.
Yes, Dr. Zelenko seemed to say evil people behind the Covid operation would be “decapitated” under Noahide laws.
But some scholars claim any non-[redacted] person who doesn’t follow the laws can be executed in that way.
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/dr-zelenko-warns-you-must-choose
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/dr-zelenko-advocates-deadly-noahide
Helpful. Thanks
Excellent article, particularly on Overton window info by Chomsky.
What I take from Malone is that, yes, maybe he is controlled opposition. But here's the thing: to get to that point, he must relate some true information, just like any double agent. So, I take what I can, but them am critical enough to parse the rest for what, as you note here, may be disinformation. Trust but verify in sum...
Thank you, Blaise.
Agreed about the true information.
Like Naomi Wolf and Dr. McCullough, Malone has a wealth of valuable insights, and one can’t help but be appreciative for this. We just need to be aware of the limits, I suppose.
So, more indications that Bob Malone is being enabled as controlled opposition to define the scope of debate and hide that our own DOD planned, funded and owned this "Covid" binary bioweapons system ethnically targeting Americans and Europeans.
Sasha Latypova would agree.
Indeed, Jimychanga.
"our own" DOD. I can no longer call it ours.
Yep. They've been working for another party for a long time, at least since the Murrah Building bombing coverup.
This party...
The editor of one of Europe's largest newspapers warned War with Russia was Deliberately Concocted by Cabal looking to destroy BOTH America and Russia for NWO https://jimychanga.substack.com/p/the-editor-of-one-of-europes-largest
Wow, it’s good a journalist has confirmed what we all suspected. I need to join your Substack soon to read that article.
It won't come as a suprise to you that during my 15 years in Australian Public Service I have not met one SES Officer nor APS staff who were familiar with Framing the debate as Noam Chomsky wrote in The Common Good (1998). Also, while researching the political landscape in Canberra, I attended approximately 30 Labour/Liberal meetings. Zero engagement when I mentioned Chomsky. Agree with you reg. Malone. Thank you for your substack.
Thank you, Bibi. I appreciate your comments.
I’m suspicious of Chomsky in the Covid operation, where he said the unjabbed might need to starve, and in 9/11, when he said he didn’t matter if the buildings were demolished.
It turns out Chomsky was a close associate of Epstein, so there may be an explanatory connection there.
However, his work in linguistics and other matters has been brilliant and illuminating.
Chomsky is NOT a "good guy"!
Chomsky disappointed many on Covid.
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/is-noam-chomskys-cruel-vaccine-position
Walk down memory lane w/radical activist/anti-war protestor Noam Chomsky .. see > John Deutch - Chomsky's friend in the Pentagon and the CIA
https://libcom.org/article/john-deutch-chomskys-friend-pentagon-and-cia
[clip] "In December 1995, The New York Times reported that Noam Chomsky approved of the appointment of his fellow MIT academic, John Deutch, as head of the CIA. (Until then Deutch had been No.2 at the Pentagon.) According to the report, Chomsky said, ' [Deutch] has more honesty and integrity than anyone I've ever met in academic life, or any anyone I've ever met in academic life, or any other life. If somebody's got to be running the CIA, I'm glad it's him.' etc.
And this surprising revelation too > Foreign Policy - Feb 27, 2013 - The CIA has nothing on Noam Chomsky (no, really)
https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/02/27/the-cia-has-nothing-on-noam-chomsky-no-really/
> Guess he wasn't ever the bad kind of Jan 6th radical rights "protestor" huh??
[clip] "The CIA has nothing on Noam Chomsky (no, really) This month, a two-year-long investigation into CIA records on Noam Chomsky concluded with a surprising result: Despite a half-century of brazen anti-war activism and countless overseas speaking engagements, the Central Intelligence Agency has no file on the legendary MIT professor. "Our searches were thorough and diligent, and it is highly unlikely that repeating those searches ......"
p.s. Can't find the rest of the this ^article tho when I click on the embedded link..
Yep, Clear that Chomsky is controlled opposition & "no CIA files" means they never collected or else destroyed his files in order to hide any CIA complicity.
Maybe, like so many, he too was not actually warning against what they described. Maybe he was not warning against restricting the Overton window, but was instead teaching how to do it properly.
Hadn’t thought of that, an interesting and awful possibility.
Absolutely agree on Chomsky. My comment did not endorse ALL Chomsky work. It was given in the context of sharing my frustration about the lack of depth of thinking during political meetings in Canberra. Even during the book launch "The political economy of inequality" written by political economist Frank Stilwell, our Liberal Party leaders were more interested in small chat than having ANY debate with the author or the audience.
Relatedly, Australia's Novavax contracts were a military operation: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-novavax-contract
https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/the-banality-of-evil
And McGowan annoying US intelligence, written days before his resignation: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/micro-donations-to-excessdeathsau
Good reporting. Thank you for staying on top of these issues in AU and NZ.
On the Novavax contracts, I wonder if they forbid serial numbers the way Pfizer’s censored contracts do.
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-dangerous-features
wtf. I will check. Only the Novavax contracts are available.
Hi James.
Thanks for this breakdown. Not sure if it is the first article of yours that I have read. Subscribed to so many stacks, and time is always short.
The tactics really are quite transparent - doesn't help that they are using the radical playbook from over a century ago. Authoritarians, not the most innovative people in the world. And given the scale of this democide of course there will be extreme layers of protection for the Black Hats. Controlling the opposition is play #1 from their playbook.
This is a one-shot gambit, played for all the chips on the planet. If and when they fail to kill us all they will swing.
I recall that early ethnic distinction someone discovered. Like GP120/HIV inserts, it seemed to slide down a memory hole very quickly.
As with 9/11, the fingerprints are pretty distinctive.
Peace.
Welcome, Andreas! Thank you for your comment.
It does seem to be a one-shot gambit, which is scary because it means they’re likely convinced they won’t get caught, perhaps due to severe damage they expect to victims or the system.
Agreed, it’s much like 9/11.
My take is that the serious unexpected blunder was the release of the docs that had been planned to not be available. That and only that removes plausibility in denial which would have been so important. Because without us knowing that there were harm signals from the start, we could have been made to believe that all harm was from the "illness" not from the "prophylaxis against the illness". Still, despite that FOIA release happening, they were forced to continue with their playbook as it had been written and rehearsed in Event 201. Because any deviation would have risked creating chaos in the global choreography, as too many lower level actors in governments and local health regulations agencies etc might have felt entitled to switch over to individual critical thinking mode, with disastrous consequences. So, despite damning evidence from their own trials, and therefore totally un-understandably in an _innocent_ frame, everything - including injecting pregnant women
- had to go on - in stark contrast to what those trials had taught. This was the one thing that made people become suspicious. Yet they had to carry on. Because the all chips gamble was not the pandemic, this is what I posit. I posit that the pandemic was supposed to roll on unremarkably, and the real all chips gamble is the WHO labeled global power grab, which was needed to be seen flowing organically, logically, automatically from the commonly experienced pandemic event. They had counted on 2 things that did not materialize as planned: 1) No aforeknowledge documented by FOIA enforced study release, 2) No visibly sudden deaths (therefore the possible Damar Hamlin death cancellation op? Because no one course-altering event was to be allowed). Oh, and one other very important aspect: No autopsies as per WHO guidance! Yet some were performed early on, which was the main if not only reason we learned early on about the "micro clotting in entire endothelium" issue. That was when blood thinners were added to private protocols. Oh, and also remarkable: At least in Germany, pharma lobbyist with no hope for continuation of his lineage to the future (he keeps a dog with his husband instead of having children with a wife) and then health minister Spahn, had unsuccessfully tried to introduce mandatory (opt-out) organ donation. His successor, pharma lobbyist and health minister Lauterbach, is trying to revive this opt-out organ donation law. Imagine the wealth of organs to dissect, eg to study remdesivir results, and lnp distribution, and spike distribution... And to sell the better looking ones for transplanting? (Merely joking here, isn't it hilarious). In any case I think they needed safe non-aforeknowledge, invisibility of sudden deaths, absence of clarity on mechanisms of harm. To make the pandemic treaty a natural-looking consequence of our common experience. Since the three important prerequisites were NOT met, we became aware, as in our hypnosis or anesthesia was broken - and yet, they have to go through the motions anyway, but now under totally reality-adverse pretentions which no-one buys any more yet no-one has the power to stop it. And that gives the entire affair its spooky, creepy feel.
Brilliant. I think you’re right about their not expecting the Pfizer trial document release, large numbers of visible sudden deaths (although it’s hard to imagine athletes dying on the field wouldn’t be caught on camera), and autopsies showing jabs as the cause of death.
Remarkably, people still have faith in leaders pushing the shots despite these revelations.
I have just reconsidered the bit about them not expecting visible drop-dead cases. I just recall all the video footage from China showing just that. In a way we had actually been primed for expecting this phenomenon. Expecting it from the "illness". Interesting to think about what actors and factions are behind such videos being made seen in the west on western social media. "The" Chinese is insufficient. I am not sure what steered such Chinese social media accounts as published those pictures to the West. It needn't even have been related to Chinese government. (See Matthew Ehret work on China and Western influence in China, Taiwan for differentiation in that regard.) So the drop dead phenomenon could have become a most impressive part of the narrative, specially given that they had made a point about asymptomatic COVID. All the dying would just be declared to have had asymptomatic COVID at some point. Easy in absence of Pfizer study data showing the harms already known and being related to the injections. Yes, I think without the FOIA reveals, the narrative would have been, look at all the players/pilots dying, isn't Covid dangerous! See now how right we were to vaccinate against it? So many deaths, infertility, stillbirths, despite our wonderful vaccines - just imagine the death count from (long) COVID if we hadn't had those! It would have been so much higher! - They are trying this narrative, just that it isn't convincing, rather preposterous under the circumstances. In absence of FOIA data we might have bought it though. So, no aforeknowledge - much harm - all from COVID - the mRNA platform saves us twice: first through the vaccines, second through mRNA cancer treatments against the turbo cancers caused by long COVID. All of that would have sounded plausible. Btw, if they succeed, soon there will be all encompassing censoring by the power grabbers. In such circumstances, the same thing might work out again. Only that their credibility is down now. El Gato Malo yesterday had a great stack about that, about them losing out in the coming trust economy (or similar). Another thing we especially our scientists need to think about NOW: establish a code for communicating between the lines in studies. For marking politically correct bullshit, which however has to be written into the studies to get them 'peer' approved, so, to mark the bullshit as mere rhetoric so we don't accidentally take it for real (as we might do in non obvious cases); and code for how to place bits of important data and information in the studies surreptitiously so that they get published with this data and can then be deciphered for useful content. This has to happen within the next three months or it comes later than their censoring simulation exercise of which you will have heard.
> Yet, if an NIH whistleblower physician with firsthand knowledge is correct, Covid injections are part of a biowarfare attack by [redacted] military intelligence principally against Europeans and Americans, and Dr. Malone’s primary message themes appear to be controlled opposition, reinforcing limits of acceptable discussion and leading you away from the perpetrators and their intentions.
I am shocked!
Hey Jerome, something tells me you’re not really shocked. :)
To me those who represent controlled opposition are somewhat easy to spot. They avoid naming the real actual threats, harangue away about some connected with the real threats, pretend to be patriots and human rights advocates but completely and skillfully ignore the place where all of these are joined at the hips. Whatever your favorite centralized world government is - it does exist and is more than likely linked at the level of WEF at Davos, Bilderberg, or another one of these. Often like Mr. M they ride white horses, have an apocalyptic and patronizing tone. Beware of limited hangouts!
Great points, KW.
Malone gets so much airtime and most of what he says seems to be said to try to impress about how plugged in he is, he's in the know, he's equal to the big guys and knows alot blah-blah and blah.
And then, too, he points out that the Masses, the Little People, are PSYCHOTIC with Mass Formation. But does he REALLY say anything that is going to help? Has he EVER said anything that would help? Any antidote to "his invention" of the biotech weapon he's ever bothered to share? At the least, he is a dangerous old windbag, taking up space but bringing nothing of substance to the table. (His "credentials" -- years of bioweaponry contracts -- are not the substance we need!) At the most he is a dangerous frontline mole inserted by the Deep State and Globalists to undermine every real frontline activist.
I appreciate the coverage here, because it is obvious we are still in big trouble.
o We are still in the crosshairs with the W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty (that word 'treaty' is used as war language, and they are expecting us to SURRENDER our sovereignty -- both our bodily sovereignty and our national sovereignty!).
o Bill Gates is still smirking and drooling, gearing up for His Next Pandemic!
o Klaus Schwab is still lurking and planning to TATTOO us all with nanotech Q DOTS identification -- just like his daddy did when he ran the slave labor factory for the Nazis where every slave laborer and prisoner was TATTOOED on the arm/wrist with an I.D. number.
These monsters haven't even stopped to take a ski vacation, folks. When they are not counting the money they stole from us the past three plus years, they are busy planning the next step to attain their New One World Order where those of us who remain after their pandemic killing sprees are all their TATTOOED SLAVES.
Excellent points, nickij.
Once a spook always a spook.
Sad seeing Chomsky say that the vaccinated should starve to death but it is what it is. https://news.yahoo.com/noam-chomsky-unvaccinated-remove-themselves-171900487.html
After working for a 3-letter agency, "you can check out, but you can never leave."
Well written, thank you. Shard a screenshot of the hard to find photo.
Awesome. Thank you, Rosalind.
NANOTECHNOLOGY is the key, not viruses. He pushes viruses
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone-d0c
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-and-countermeasures
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-malone-the-5-billion-contract
https://outraged.substack.com/p/r-w-malone-speaks-out
https://outraged.substack.com/p/robert-w-malone-vaccines-on-demand
https://outraged.substack.com/p/operation-warp-speed-father-robert
Good research. Thank you!
Can you imagine that with his knowledge, with his credentials, he would have taken Moderna injection on the basis of rumors that this one would treat a long Covid?
I replied to a comment yesterday:
He didn't take it. He KNOWS what the ingredients are. He consulted on hydroxychloroquine research in the fall of 2020. He knew how to "treat long Covid." As an "insider" he knew about ADE (but said he was waiting to see if there would be ADE, but there were "rumors" that it helps treat long Covid, which he had). https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download - page 16 of the following document, from October 22, 2020 - -Vaccine enhanced disease - IT WAS KNOWN
He knows all the "adjuvants" and technologies. Never speaks about them. I know and I speak but he knows so much more.
I strongly suspect you’re correct.
I don’t trust that any “leader” we’ve seen supposedly getting jabbed really got anything like they coerce the rest of us to take.
Why would they show us photos and videos of these people getting the shots? It’s juvenile for anyone to think, “Oh, there’s Biden getting the vaccine, so it must be trustworthy. I’ll run out now and get it!”
Yet, that’s how many people do think, and that’s why theater is presented.
One of Sasha Latypova’s most important findings is different vials potentially contain different ingredients, as GMP standards are not followed. Some vials reportedly have no DNA or mRNA, some have heavy metals, etc.
If this is true, it’s a form of Russian roulette.
The Russian roulette only because they just couldn't make it more consistent while at the same time rapidly vaccinating 8bln humans many a time on short notice. Next time it will work more consistently while less conspicuously, achieving better results at the desired time horizon. And with more plausible deniability. But, they achieved a lot in a rather elegant manner even on the first try. I mean, none of them is about to pay for what they've done any time soon.
Hi Andreas,
I wonder if it’s “because they just couldn’t make it more consistent” or if different vials are intended to have different ingredients.
That serialization of vials and cartons (as opposed to batches, or lots) is forbidden by contract seems revealing of bad intent.
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-dangerous-features
Yes, could be, it's hard to know. Seems like they went too hard initially and then dialed it back somewhat, but that compromised the "efficacy", thus now requiring more rounds. Some initial small batches seemed to have been the most deadly, and that was the process of them discovering the "golden ratio"? But with the mRNA technology alone, there are so many promising ways to do many "good" things all at once. The sky is the limit.
James - Surely you know about this site by now?? > "How Bad is my Batch?"
[re: the so-called differences betw "C19 vaxx"] > https://howbadismybatch.com
> Batch codes & associated deaths, disabilities & illnesses for Cov19 Vaxx
> Different batches had different overall total adverse effects & some batches were far more deadly than others by the numbers. So that goes to deliberate toxicity manipulation & separating out groups of individuals from others by different degrees of so-called vaxx dangers & toxicity. Not the same products.
> NO DENIABILITY < (as if there was ANY deadly product deniability by any manufacturer before this analysis of the overall "C19 vaxx" batch #'s anyway)
[excerpt] "This vaccine comes with significant adverse event risks as reported on the WHO's own database - Vigiaccess.org, where 311,843 adverse eventsare recorded so far including Facial Paralysis, Heart Inflammation, Pericarditis, Brain Damage, Meningitis, Encephalitis, and Guillain-Barre. ...
> How Bad is My Batch . Batch codes and associated deaths, disabilities and illnesses for Covid 19 Vaccines .
(See the data listed for each manufacturers' vaxx/batches at the link...)
Moderna 2021 Data
Moderna 2021 Data - How Bad is my Batch
Pfizer 2021 Data
Pfizer 2021 Data - How Bad is my Batch
Janssen 2021 Data
etc etc
YOUR BATCH IS NOT FOUND IN THE 2021 ARCHIVE, IN THE 2000 MOST TOXIC. THIS IS HISTORICAL DATA FOR 2021 ONLY. PLEASE USE LOT NUMBER SEARCH ENGINE ON HOME PAGE FOR CURRENT DATA. "Please support our work - we have 100,000 visitors every day. Changing minds - saving lives." Please donate. Created by Craig Paardekooper ©2022
International Deadly Lots
However, one of my colleagues wanted data just on young people of an athletic age (18-35), so I filtered for that age range. On doing so I obtained 887 reports that provided an onset interval. Of these 887 reports, 700 reports had onset within 24 hours - thats 79% of the reports. 806 had onset within 48 hours - thats 90% !
WARNING : NASAL FLU VACCINE UK. As of 1st September 2023 all secondary school students in the UK will be offered Fluenz, a nasal spray vaccine for influenza.This vaccine comes with significant adverse event risks as reported on the WHO's own database ...
looks like he has a graphene nano mask on, maybe that caused his AE, lol.
don’t forget about his support for “track & trace.”
beware “RESTRICT” Act enables the violation of your mind as “PREP” Act enabled violation of your body…
https://kitten.substack.com/p/under-the-radar
Hi kitten,
Great point about the black mask, quite possibly a graphene one from China, and track and trace!
The latter procedures don’t work for respiratory viruses and only impose more surveillance and “quarantines” of healthy people.
I should add that to the article.
Is there even a spike protein? This came up in the comments on this article. And I quote,
"The purported mRNA would be biological if it does exist because they use bacteria to produce them, and that's a biological process.
I still can't decide whether there's mRNA in the shots or not. Too much conflicting info. But if there is, it's definitely not a 'spike' protein because that's just a stupid proposition. A 'spike' protein (which doesn't exist, it's just suggestive, scary imagery for an infantile culture) is, in theory, just an infinitesimally tiny glycoprotein that would have zero function when unattached to a 'virus' (exosome), and is so small even WBCs would look at it like a leftover crumb on their plates.
Because most of the injuries have fibrotic disease in common, the most likely mRNAs that they are culturing and putting in the LNPs are tumor exosomes. That's assuming there are mRNAs. Jury's still out imo. If so, the decades and billions spent on cancer research are paying off.
Fibrotic disease -- excess fibrin production by fibroblasts -- destroys tissues. Myocarditis, for example, is caused by excess production of fibrin by the fibroblasts in the heart wall.
One of the two major classes of tumor exosomes signal to fibroblasts for fibrin production because that's what tumors are made of.
The other main class of tumor exosomes signal for igg3 suppression and igg4 upregulation so that the 'immune' system doesn't thwart the tumor formation that the intelligent body has called for in order to sequester fat-soluble toxins that the body is unable to deposit in adipose tissue; it's supposed to be a temporary overflow/redundancy function. Cancer happens when it becomes a permanent necessity".
https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/confirmation-there-is-no-spike-protein/comments#comment-16642950
Proposal: stop the bioweapon shots, confiscate the supply, analyze the contents forensically, destroy the remainder. Who could reasonably argue with that? (Initiative of Dr. Joseph Sansone of Florida using county Republican committees to accomplish it--4 counties have passed the resolution thus far). It should serve as a template for action everywhere. As far as I know, not one US politician has actively joined by sponsoring such a bill at the state or federal level. What does that say?
Exactly, John.
There’s almost no political will to investigate thoroughly.
Almost forgot.. I was thinking about you yesterday and now here you are 🤣😉 I’m glad you still around writing
Thank you, Ranger71.
Been busy lately, but there are a several topics I want to write about in the near future.
I disagree. I have watched his awakening unfold. It’s slow but it’s happening. He’ll get there. He’s genuine.
I hope you’re right, Damien.
So do I. He came to speak in Santa Barbara early on. I know a lot of people who were involved in that effort. I have trusted them and their judgment from the outset. They all believe him to be a fine human. I’m good with that. I read every email he has ever sent and I’ve yet to see a chink in his armor. He’s just not quite as far along.
yeah well not lying.
This.
He's not stupid. He also pushes the lies of "virology" which is always a red flag for me. And he's been in bio-weapon development for most of his career, so there is another...
My assessment is that you are correct. I think the problem is that most people are busy, they have jobs, families, etc., and they haven't invested sufficient time in listening to people like Dr. Malone to really understand "where they are coming from". I have a background in nursing, which gave me a major advantage in understanding journal articles about SARS-CoV-2/COVID and understanding researchers and doctors discussing the virus and its effects and treatment protocols. I'm retired, and have been closely following the "pandemic" since it first really hit the news in January 2020. For months I spent probably 8 hours per day or more studying the beast— partly for my own protection since I am in a high-risk cohort. So by the time I caught it (summer 2020), I had my serum vitamin D very high, had Ivermectin, vitamin C, zinc, quercetin, my oxygen sensor, etc. all ready. Got through it just fine except for a residual fatigue/mitochondrial dysfunction effect. At the time I hadn't heard anything about spikes and mitochondrial toxicity, so it took me a while to self-diagnose by a process of elimination. ("It's the ATP, stupid"!)
So in the course of my studies, I watched hours and hours of videos of all our "COVID heros": Dr. McCullough, Bartlett, Kory, Marik, Nass, Merrit, Cole, etc., and yes, Dr. Malone. I think I have a pretty good grasp of what he has been saying from the beginning of his "coming on the scene". And I don't think his critics have/are really listening to him, or else they are not understanding him. He is a scientist as well as an M.D. He doesn't like to make unfounded speculation, so he is cautious in the way he states things. Non-scientists may not understand that.
He often reveals his "inside the system" perspective. The "good people at the FDA". I imagine he can't face the truth about how thoroughly corrupted by evil the institutions he "worked" have become.
I hope you are right.