[Redacted] gatekeeps alternative news: researcher

Support through Ko-Fi, Buy Me a Coffee, crypto, or mail.

---

In the video clipped above, comedian and podcaster Jimmy Dore says:

I grew up in Chicago where “nazis” would march every year through Skokie, which was a Jewish community filled with “holocaust survivors.”

And guess what?

They allowed them to march because the “holocaust survivors” in Skokie loved free speech more than they hated “nazis.”

In recent years, Dore’s YouTube channel has grown to over 1.5 million subscribers and helped expose [redacted] military intelligence’s censorship of Americans’ speech, Covid shot harms, and [redacted] control of U.S. politicians and of the Epstein and JFK assassination files.

---

---

Given Dore’s open discussion of [redacted] intelligence’s influence in these matters, one wonders why YouTube has not banned him.

Could it be because he and cohosts frequently reinforce Hollywood narratives you’re supposed to accept about “nazis“?

Anti-German propaganda

In The Myth of German Villainy, author Ben Bradbury casts doubt on these stories:

I served in the United States Navy from 1955 until 1977, mostly as a Navy pilot, and saw a lot of the world as a result. …

After traveling around most of Europe, Germany emerges as my favorite country. During our visits there we found the German people to be pleasant, industrious, disciplined and civilized with many similarities to traditional Americans. They in no way resemble the stereotypes depicted in all the anti-Nazi movies, books and articles we have been subjected to over the years. …

My generation grew up virtually inundated with anti-German propaganda. We were taught, quite literally, to hate the Germans as a people. Yet, Germans I have met or befriended through the years seem no different from other Europeans, or even Americans, and they seem no more inclined to violence and militarism than anyone else; if anything, less. I have never detected anything that might be considered intrinsically “wrong” with the German character. They are a highly cultured, highly civilized people in every respect. When studied objectively, even Germany’s leaders of the 1930s and 40s were not very different from other European leaders. They were only made out to be different by the relentless hate propaganda directed against them.

Germany suffered more than any other country by far as a result of World War II. Some 160 of her largest cities and towns were completely destroyed by the Allied bombing campaign and perhaps as many as 20 million Germans lost their lives as a result of the war. Yet, no one wants to hear their tales of suffering, and no sympathy has been allowed the defeated and disgraced Germans. The anti-German propaganda has cultivated the general feeling that they got what they deserved.

The entire responsibility for starting both wars and for all the death and destruction resulting from them has been assigned to the Germans (though the facts don’t bear that out). Because they were the losers of both World Wars, they were never permitted to present their case before the world court, nor to tell their side of the story through any medium. The winners of wars, after all, write the history books. Neither did the true story of what happened during the war come out in the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Trials were nothing more than Soviet-style show trials which violated every standard of traditional British and American justice. Their purpose was not to discover guilt or innocence, but to spread a legal gloss over a decision which had already been made to execute Germany’s leaders. The entire Nuremberg circus was a sham and a travesty.

The anti-German propaganda, used to create the climate of hatred that made the massive destruction and the mass slaughter of German civilians possible, continued relentlessly long after the war was over, when it would seem natural for sober minded historians to begin to moderate their extreme views about Germany. The fantastic atrocity stories continue even today. One needs only to tune in to the History Channel to see them repeated again and again. In contrast, World War I was not long over before the atrocity stories attributed to the Germans during that war were exposed as the deliberate lies they were. Responsible men conducted thorough investigations and found that none of it was true. All the lurid stories were deliberately fabricated to win British public support for the war against Germany and also to bring America into the war.

But a different factor was in play after World War II to keep the phony horror stories alive which did not exist after World War I. After WWII, [redacted] exploited the anti-German world sentiment, which they themselves had largely created with their propaganda, to justify the creation of their long sought after state of [redacted] as a homeland for the [redacted] people. Through manipulation of the international information media, [redacted] won worldwide sympathy for themselves with their sensational stories of unique [redacted] suffering at the hands of the cruel Germans. They claimed that Germany had followed a systematic plan to exterminate all of Europe’s [redacted] and that by war’s end had managed to kill 6 million of them. The alleged method was to round [redacted] up from all over Europe, haul them in trains to so-called “death camps” where they were herded into gas chambers and killed, and their bodies then burned in giant crematoria, with, conveniently, no forensic evidence of what had happened left behind. In the absence of forensic evidence, eye witness testimony, no matter how [bizarre], sufficed to convict Germany and to make her the pariah of civilized nations.

I have not studied this issue. Could Bradbury be telling the truth?

Jimmy Dore’s message seems to be:

Don’t believe what [redacted] intelligence tells you about America’s reasons for bombing Iran, but you should totally believe all their TV shows and movies about World War II.

This “believability” is why they jail Europeans who ask questions about it and why they plan to imprison Americans for questioning it too!

---

---

Disclaimer: This newsletter rejects racism and antisemitism and does not suggest all or most in any societal group are involved in any crime or coverup. Articles here are presented to understand current events and save lives.

---

Similarly, Reiner Fuellmich, Naomi Wolf, and Vera Sharav seem to blame “nazis” for Covid tyranny.

---

---

Another analyst has this take:

Right now if you turn on [redacted]-skeptical channels on YouTube, what do you see? ... Aaron Maté on Jimmy Dore, Max Blumenthal on Breaking Points, Amy Goodman on Democracy Now, Jeffrey Sachs on Judge Nap, Richard Wolff on Danny Haiphong ... some of these are worse than others, some may even be acting in good faith, but the fact is on mainstream [redacted]-controlled platforms like YouTube, it's impossible to have an anti-[redacted] conversation without a [redacted] gatekeeper or a [redacted] handler.

Why does every discussion or conversation about [redacted] have to be guided and monitored by [redacted]?

Here’s the full quote and context: