Many if not all mass shootings are [redacted] intelligence operations that seek to disarm Americans and employ crisis actors playing victims and relatives, say researchers like Ole Dammegard.
If this were true, one would expect to see such actors urging forced surrender of guns, making citizens more vulnerable to tyranny and crime, such as by border invaders.
That’s exactly what we see.
Former comedienne Rosie O’Donnell joins in the messaging, and apparently she’s not joking this time:
Con job signs
Here’s how to know you’re being scammed by gun grabblers like Rosie:
They demand banning “assault weapons” without defining the term.
When gun-banning legislation is later proposed, it almost always defines “assault weapon” as any gun capable of firing more than one bullet, including revolvers and semiautomatic handguns and rifles.
If these laws are passed as drafted, Americans could own only Nerf guns, until [redacted] intelligence takes those away too.
They don’t recommend more help for mental illness or drug addiction, although we’re told mass shooters are all delusional psychotics who often take drugs.
They demand taking guns only from law-abiding citizens, never from only convicted felons or potentially dangerous mentally ill persons after full due process.
They never suggest ruling out involvement by intelligence agencies, known to set up patsies for shootings like the Kennedy assassinations.
They never propose examining the role of SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), which most alleged mass shooters are prescribed, we’re told, when these events occur.
They never suggest beefing up security at schools or malls with more armed personnel to prevent such alleged shootings.
Emotional staging for grabbling guns
Intelligence agencies apparently hope Americans will suspend rationality to destroy the Second Amendment while being overwhelmed with emotions, say researchers.
For instance, the alleged crisis actress below — unlikely to win an Academy Award anytime soon — spins a tearful yarn while helicopter sounds and flashing police lights heighten emotional impact.
Sometimes it appears she’s looking down through her sunglasses to read a script.
Then she “spontaneously” adds:
Please, could we do something with the assault weapons …?
What parent who lost a child only moments earlier makes a public request on TV to remove lawful citizens’ constitutional rights and is given ample airtime to do so?
If instead she had asked that trained school staff be equipped with millions more guns to prevent such alleged incidents, would she have been given a national platform on ABC News?
Support this work.
Crisis actors are gun grabblers