(This article is being updated as new information comes in.)
Donald Trump’s assassination attempt appears to have been staged to increase his popularity and appear to “fulfill prophecy,” especially among the 250 million religious Americans who say things like:
Trump’s missed bullet was a miracle that shows God chose him and wants him elected again!
This implies Trump and some in the Secret Service were in on the plan, and alleged shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks (or whoever the now-deceased roof rifleman was) was a patsy who might have shot real bullets toward the bleachers.
(Update 7/20/24: Chris Martenson’s audio analysis suggests at least two gunmen shot live rounds in the direction of Trump and the crowd. The first shooter seems to have fired three shots from the building on whose roof the second shooter, presumably Crooks, was perched. A third shooter could also have been involved.)
Politicians and media have you assume without question Trump narrowly escaped death when a bullet hit his ear, and the only questions they force your focus on are (1) whether the Secret Service’s “failures” were negligent or intentional; and (2) what kind of “White domestic terrorist” Crooks must be, so they can advance more antiwhite and antigun legislation.
Remember, these people lie to you constantly and cannot be trusted.
(Top video by Tim Truth.)
Of this plan, Miriam AF writes:
Many people have been predicting for years there would be a fake assassination attempt on Trump, and here it is. And how do we know it's fake? Because if you're a real threat to the establishment and they want to assassinate you, they don't just "attempt" it (see the fate of true political hero, John Magufuli, late President of Tanzania, who told his people Covid was a hoax and warned them not to take the vaccine. Contrast that to Donald "father of the vaccine" Trump...).
The purpose of the fake "assassination attempt" is so obvious that even normies can see it.
"Oh well, that's massively bolstered his appeal and now he'll get elected," they're all saying.
Yes. Exactly. That's the point of it. It's called a publicity stunt and high-level politicians act them out all the time.
The "shooter" is - as they always are in these faked, staged events - a 'lone wolf' patsy, who the press already, miraculously, has detailed biographical information about, including the knowledge that he "once donated to Biden's campaign".
Conveniently, said "shooter" is now dead.
So this event is perfectly curated to ignite the already very heated tensions between Democrats and Republicans to absolute boiling point, enabling Republicans to "prove" that Democrats are unstable violent killers (just as Democrats attempt to "prove" this about Republicans every time an alleged far-right extremist supposedly shoots up a school etc).
The good thing about events like this is that they are very revealing litmus tests that allow us to identify who's an honest, reliable commentator and who's not.
Anyone high-profile taking this "assassination attempt" seriously and telling us it's "proof" of just how threatened the establishment / Democrats / random 20-year-olds are by Trump is just playing into the performative Punch 'n' Judy political theatre and working to keep you neutralised by platforming people like Trump as real opposition.
At the very least, these kind of commentators are guilty of gullibility and still, after all this time, not grasping how the world stage really works and that - when sensationalist global events are literally performed on a stage by actors, they're probably not real.
Signs
1. “Miracle” fantasy
You’re told Trump’s supposed ear graze is a “miracle” resulting from his turning his head at just the right moment for “the bullet” to miss his head.
In fact, miracles — defined as suspension of laws of physics or biology — have never been shown to exist.
Just like angels, devils, ghosts, goblins, ESP, telekinesis, mental telepathy, psychics, and astrology, no alleged supernatural phenomenon has ever had a shred of real evidence proffered for its legitimacy.
Anyone who could present solid evidence of a miracle would surely win the Nobel Prize in physics or chemistry. Why hasn’t this ever happened?
Using magical thinking and ignorant of probability and statistics, many Americans are quick to conclude Trump’s “ear piercing” was “divine intervention,” a miracle bestowed by “God.”
Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders reinforces this myth:
So does congressman and former US Army sniper Cory Mills (R-FL):
1a. Likelihood = zilch
Scientifically, a bullet nicking Trump’s ear and missing his head should instead be viewed as an event so improbable — having perhaps a one in one quadrillion (1E-15) chance of occurring — it is virtually impossible.
Furthermore, when one considers Trump’s head not moving with the alleged bullet impact and his ear not bleeding much or showing signs of a skin tear, the odds fall squarely to zero.
2. Trump’s ear did not bleed enough for a gunshot wound
The human ear is highly vascular and bleeds prodigiously when cut.
Trump had relatively little blood on his ear and no sign of active bleeding despite no one compressing his “wound” during the escapade.
In addition, the top video shows his right hand had no blood on it when he touched his ear immediately after the alleged hit, though this alone is not conclusive because perhaps the purported bleeding had not started yet.
But here is Trump’s seemingly blood-free right hand and clean white shirt when he stood back up:
3. Phony face blood streaks
Trump’s facial “blood” streaks do not appear natural.
They resemble Braveheart battle paint, possibly to make the gullible think he’s a warrior savior fighting for us.
See further discussion of the streaks here.
4. No skin break on Trump’s ear
If a bullet hit Trump’s ear, he would have had a laceration, perforation, or partial avulsion of the ear.
There was no clear sign of this in photos or videos.
The Daily Mail reports that two weeks after Trump’s ear was “shot,” there was no evidence of any wound or skin damage.
a. How they did the ear trick
It’s plausible Trump had a tiny radiofrequency (RF) receiver attached to the back of his right ear to provide a mild electric shock at the precise instant they would claim a bullet whizzed by his head.
That way, Trump could be prompted to appear suddenly irritated and grab the ear with his hand at the correct moment.
5. Trump’s head did not move on “impact”
Trump was supposedly shot with an AR-15 rifle.
Yet, as shown in the top video, his head remained motionless with the “hit” to his ear.
A standard AR-15 bullet carries approximately 1300 ft-lbs of kinetic energy, and high-velocity AR-15 bullets have kinetic energies over 2,500 ft-lbs (source).
There is no way a bullet having this amount of energy could have even touched Trump’s ear without his head moving in response, whether by impact or reflex.
For more, see this comment.
6. “Shooter” was not killed until after firing shots
Spoofing the event can explain why the alleged shooter was not killed until after reportedly firing at least three shots.
They needed to make it look like “the shooter” caused Trump’s ear “injury,” and this could not have happened if the Secret Service or police killed the gunman before these shots were fired.
7. Trump contradicts evidence, won’t talk about it anymore
See discussion and video here.
8. Staging fits religious psyop
In the 2022 video below, Adam Green and Donnie Darkened discuss how Trump might return to the presidency in 2024 after an alleged assassination attempt including a head wound that heals, all to “fulfill prophecy.”
See also this article and this:
9. Right ear piercing is a [redacted] sign of servitude
Researchers say there is religious significance in piercing the right ear, as described below.
Also see this article.
Conclusion
Past [redacted] intelligence operations that killed or conned Americans — like 9/11, Covid, the Kennedy assassinations, and the USS Liberty — had false cover stories that were at least superficially feasible.
Today, many citizens seem convinced Trump’s “ear grazing” and “miracles” in general — impossible by definition — must be accepted as “news” and “facts.”
Does believing religious myths not give the myth makers control over you?
Support this work.
Share this post